Question about frames
4 years ago
Romania

Would the WR be faster or slower if framerules weren't 21 frames but 1 frame ( like most games nowadays). It probably would be faster but by how much?

Louisiana, USA

This doesn’t matter. It will never matter.

Québec

@loafofbred98 calm down he was just asking a question. @SG4 it would be faster by around 1.5 second

SG4, TheSecondTry and 5 others like this

@WolfAttacK 8-1, 8-2 and technically 8-4 have 0 frames to spare, 1-1 and 1-2 have only a few frames to spare, 4-1, 4-2, and 8-3 can have some frames to spare, so I think it would sum up to about half a second.

Québec

Yeah you're right, I thought 1-1, 4-1 and 4-2 were way more lenient

Romania

Thanks for the responses guys. SMB is really interesting and the way it works. So I gather that a 4:54 would be inevitable without 21 frame framerules maybe even a low 4:54 or a high 4:53.

Québec

On the RTA side, we would already have a 4:54. On the TAS side, mid 4:53 would be the final time

A TAS would save: 20 frames in 1-1 15 frames in 1-2 not sure how many frames in 4-1 20 frames in 4-2 4 frames in 8-1 7 frames in 8-2 not sure how many frames in 8-3 So that's at least 66 frames saved, plus some extra time in 4-1 and 8-3, meaning that without framerules, the TAS can go down to around 4:52.6xx.

SG4 likes this
Game stats
Followers
8,518
Runs
9,799
Players
2,004
Latest news
SNES9x Ban

Effective immediately, any submissions using the SNES9x emulator will not be verified. The SMB1 mod team has concerns about its integrity due to its ability to overclock and remove lag frames, which may not be easily detectable. Additionally, we request that all BizHawk submissions avoid using the S

2 months ago
Latest threads
Posted 10 months ago
30 replies
Posted 6 years ago
1 reply
Posted 1 day ago
Posted 7 days ago
34 replies