Comments
thread: Mega Man X6
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

[quote ="orsa"] this leaderboard is a shitshow right now.

here's my opinion, and i think it's pretty reasonable:

remove ps2 emulator times. there's absolutely no reason that these should be staying on the leaderboards when they're at least 30 seconds faster than XC GC, let alone PS2.

separate xc with ps1. make all versions of xc a miscellaneous category, since xc has the advantage on loads (and lag, most of the time, although i will admit this is a bit weird with turtloid rain lag. it would be nice if we could separate it further, but i don't think it's realistic).

for ps1 i would standardize on sds and normal, due to inconsistent loading times and the majority of ps1 runs being on normal. i have no opinion on what to do with XC, and that should be left up to the people who actually run on XC (cyber, 8bit, etc).

timing out loads fails to take into account differences in version (ps2 vs gcn xc with shark player) and lag (ps1 vs xc, again, most of the time). [/quote]

END QUOTE

Standardizing PSX isn't a bad thing since I don't intend on running that version but for XC, I'd see nothing wrong with putting all difficulties on the same leaderboard, so in essence we'd trim the categories lists from 18 (yikes) to only 6 . Easy fix, everyone is satisfied, just would need to know what exactly is agreed upon by PSX community as "Standardized"

thread: Mega Man X6
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

You need to actually post good replies cyberdemon with proof and whatnot because atm you are doing nothing but clogging up this thread. PSX version of X6 is actually the most popular and you could argue the PSX record is actually the most optimized

thread: Mega Man X6
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

Until we can figure out a common ground leader board will not accept any new runs, nor shall it be edited.

@cyberdemon531 that's not a good argument, like it any sense of the word.

thread: Mega Man X6
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

So you propose to ban future submissions of PS2 emu but keep the current ones on? How is this remotely competent?

thread: Mega Man X6
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

PS2 Emu was NEVER accepted in the community so please get this through your head

thread: Mega Man X6
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

Yeah the "look" of the board is gonna be hard to do, that's gonna take some time.

thread: Mega Man X6
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

We're not alienating emu runners, only runs done on PS2 emulator as it is faster than the fastest version on console (XC GCN), this is it. PSX emulators are more lightweight and more legitimate.

As for other suggestions, I'm down for just combining all versions on a full leaderboard but I'd need others to weigh in. I'd definitely want difficulty separate as I find it dumb that 1 runner can hold multiple places on the LB (as it stands, 1 runner can hold 6 spots)

thread: Mega Man X6
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

I'm not really for removal of loading times because it would not account for lag for psx version, and it'd be dumb to force moderators to time out loads in a console game.

Milk likes this
thread: Mega Man X6
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

@SubStylee

XEBRA is currently the most accurate PSX emulator.

I think Substylee brings up a valid point about removing Normal since every speed games uses "Fastest vs. Hardest" in their rule sets. For XC at least, removing Normal times sounds like a good idea, but then again all difficulties can be different categories

thread: Mega Man X6
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

For emulation:

At this point and time, PS2 emulation should be completely removed form this leaderboard. If new versions of PS2 emulation were to come out and happen to be more accurate, then further tested should be done.

If PS2 Emulation were to be allowed, it must be hidden by default, which in essence would hide completely valid PSX emulation times (the feature is an All or None function), so it's just better to ban PS2 emulation until more accurate emulators are available.

For XC separation from PSX:

This leaderboard should reflect the current leaderboard setup on the mmrta leaderboard, no exceptions. As it stands, PSX is it's own category and XC is it's own. I'd imagine PC would be in same board as PSX but no one has tested that.

For difficulty separation:

Different difficulties are different categories, every single speed game does this. Comparing a run done on Easy to a run done on Normal is not even remotely possible. Same thing as comparing easy to Xtreme.

That being stated, however, there's been a potential discussion on banning all but normal difficulty in PSX version (as well as FDS), so it could easily be reflected in XC to just group all together, which is something I'd have no issue with since XC is only platform that actually uses easy difficulty in competitive settings.

In essence I am for this point but w/ a little bit more detail:

Make the standard PS1 and separate XC into different categories, while banning PS2 emu (Until a later time in which PS2 emulations becomes accurate) and standardizing the most accurate ps1 emus.

Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

EDIT: Discord server is another link

Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

If actions can be buffered from the pause menu (meaning you can hold a button in, unpause, and then that action is peformed), then IGT wouldn't be needed but I'd like for people to test this w/ input viewers if possible. Otherwise IGT looks like a good thing to switch to.

If the only advantage pause buffering has is to make some skips easier, then I see no need to stick to RTA as the advantages of timing IGT instead of RTA are really numerous.

Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

Yeah I really don't like this either, but if more people agree that the tokens need delievered then we'll add that in, need more input before this is official tho (the category name was the main reason I didn't think it'd be worth it to put tokens in well, unless you define a cheat as a collectible then idk lol)

Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

So I'm going to revisit this again and try to put a definition I think would be best case for this game.

All Collectibles

This would be the category name and, having thought about what this entails, it would mean the following:

  1. Get all health upgrades
  2. Get all Spellstone (kinda goes hand in hand with health)
  3. Get all Krazoa spirits
  4. Get all staff upgrades (includes the 3 magic upgrades; quake is not needed, only super quake)
  5. Get all maps
  6. Get final scarab bag and bomfadad bag
  7. Get the lanturn, zoom googles, tricky's ball, blowhorn, Cloudrunner Flute (any item that's permanent in C-stick menu)
  8. Get all secret tokens (do not have to be delievered)

Things not required:

Any story mode item that is a one time use (like golden root) and perishable items like bomb spores and fuel cells.

thread: Star Fox
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

Runs for this game must be recorded using a capture card as of August 10, 2015.

Runs submitted / verified prior to this date will be valid and allowed to stay on the board.

BroDudeMan and LowKeeee like this
thread: The Site
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

I understand, either way this is still a great step in the right direction, just wanted to understand from a coder / admin perspective.

Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

Pausing doesn't affect the IGT so if we time by IGT we gotta allow IGT strats, no exceptions.

As for rules on the deaths, it'd suck but it's the easiest to just ban mission checkpoint restarts, if that's all right with everyone.

Also the "pause and leave" rule is pretty dumb lol, I'd not worry about that one.

thread: The Site
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

While I understand that from a community perspective, I was looking more for a site wide perspective. Is this meant to be a site where any speed run ever done can be found? Or is this meant to be a site where a community can put their times on a leaderboard.

thread: The Site
Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

This may seem like a dumb question but to elaborate, in the About it states it is to be a "one-stop shop for speedrunning leaderboards."

Does this mean that this site is meant to be a collaborate data base of every speed run known, regardless of whether the run is done on console, console emulators, community accepted emulators, and banned from competition emulators?

I am asking this because I moderate and speed run games that have issues w/ them being emulated, such as Star Fox, and atm we currently ban any emulated run from being accepted as no emulator is remotely accurate for those games.

Though reading this site's About is making me wonder if this is the right thing to do. I know it's community driven how the rules are stated, but is the goal to host only "legitimate" speed runs?

I define legitimate speed runs as ones done either on console or on a community accepted emulator slower than or equal to console.

Pennsylvania, USAzewing9 years ago

I agree, it's not that hard to calculate in any case. I want more feedback from runners (SGDQ is going on so we'll have to wait) before I collect all input and make a decision

About zewing
I speedrun video games. My runs can also be found at fzerocentral.org for my F-Zero series time attack rankings.
Joined
10 years ago
Online
today
Runs
274
Games run
Metal Gear: Ghost Babel VR Missions
108
Runs
Uchuu Race: Astro Go! Go!
Uchuu Race: Astro Go! Go!
Last run 1 year ago
30
Runs
Sonic Chaos (SMS)
Sonic Chaos (SMS)
Last run 2 years ago
24
Runs
F-Zero 99
F-Zero 99
Last run 3 months ago
22
Runs
Super Racing
Super Racing
Last run 1 year ago
18
Runs
Army Men: Sarge's Heroes
Army Men: Sarge's Heroes
Last run 6 years ago
15
Runs
Metal Gear: Ghost Babel
Metal Gear: Ghost Babel
Last run 5 years ago
6
Runs
Star Fox: Assault
Star Fox: Assault
Last run 9 years ago
4
Runs
Games followed
Secret of the Stars
Secret of the Stars
Last visit 1 month ago
703
visits
Games moderated
Uchuu Race: Astro Go! Go!
Uchuu Race: Astro Go! Go!
Last action 1 year ago
30
actions
Secret of the Stars
Secret of the Stars
Last action 1 month ago
10
actions