Somerset, England
SupporterSupport tickets might not be the best thing to submit?
What's your old account called, as I'll help you message site staff to recover it
I don't think people liking posts from years ago would make the forums worse now? But there are people like @Zanum who still like a bunch of posts lmao.
Maybe it's getting boring as ya'll keep on replying to the same threads, where, of course, the replies are repetitive.
You're not the only one, this is an annoying bug.
I've made a forum post about this before where I say how to bypass this issue, and what I think causes it.
https://www.speedrun.com/great_school_breakout/forums/22nvc this thread with only banned bots needs to be deleted
@finetixboost - uses an em dash in their post, has a website on their profile, a random bio, and their username is the same as the linked website
@ruzgarefe123456789 the rejection reason tells you why. It's because you haven't provided a video link to your run, and have instead sent the file name.
Upload your run onto YouTube or something and put its link instead.
I saw you post this on Reddit too. But someone did respond with the answer. https://www.reddit.com/r/speedrun/comments/1lhn16z/comment/mz58wwy/
The "never" appears when the run doesn't have a date, or if the date is set to 0. As dates on the site are recorded in unix time. A run with a date of 0 can be created using API v2, and a few really old runs don't have dates either.
The reason it says the word "never" is that in the site's code, if there's an empty value then it displays "never" by default. I'm not sure if this is their own code or from a library. It seems like they use Luxon for dates on here.
@jackzfiml was that random link meant for counting? As it's been deleted by starsmiley lmao think you're a bot
Yeah it has to be with the shotgun, as it's American% and Americans have guns (I didn't come up with the name).
The rules should probably be updated.
@IchinoseHonami hopefully someone can verify it soon, maybe I can when I get home.
@CassidyUwU, it's ok. We actually made a mistake and rejected the wrong run. We meant to reject your duplicate run instead. And runs shouldn't be rejected for being obsolete anyway
