It would be a nightmare to add about 120 more IL leaderboards and maintain them. Unless any of the other mods want to go through that effort it's not happening.
good time to say if someone named physics based gameplay or jarhead shows up in the discord, just ban on sight
- Still way more than SM64 ILs.
- We're talking about ILs, not full-game categories.
- 242 Star is the game's 100% category.
if people do it for practice then why would they need a leaderboard for it. That's like saying I wouldn't want to run this game and get good because there aren't individual level leaderboards so I can't practice them.
yes but what you stated doesn't attract people to run the game. IL's don't attract people to run a game because it allows them to practice. IL practice has nothing to do with an IL leader board. If you can prove to me that IL leader boards get's more people interested in running full game RTA or for strat finding and overall community involvement then I think it can be added but as of right now there is nothing valuable on the table for IL leader boards to be added.
@Jarhead_71 You're criticizing him for being biased yet you're trying to push changes in a game you've never ran? To be fair, I'm not against having all stars on the leaderboards, but I think some of your criticism is unfair.
I agree with Francesco on this. I've at least attempted running this game while i've not found anything that you have even tried running this game. On the note of me not doing IL's of games that I don't run full game RTA, I have tons of games and IL's that i've done and tried to optimize that I either lost the video too or didn't feel the need to submit, and therefore twitch deleted the vod. A simple look into my profile can show some things but not all things.
First of all, thank you to everyone who voted. This was the biggest turnout we've ever had, reaching 112 votes! Here is the final verdict: Co-Star (2P) runs will be split from No Co-Star (1P) runs for ALL categories, but Co-Star runs will appear first by default. We will not be implementing th