13

11

9

7

5 Comment: imo a reset counting as a lock doesn't matter since it's at 1 anyways lol

1

1

Comment: Also, you edited your 2 in the current run before a lock was commented, so the run resets. Hehe

5 Comment: You edited your post on 148. Even if everything was fine and you hadn't edited your post, and even if Pengu's edit was also within the rules, italvera reset the run by posting 1. Can't stop that from resetting the run. If anything was in question, italvera should've continued the count and waited for an official ruling

3 Comment: If you comment "lock" or "Lock," every post before that becomes locked. Locked means that it can be edited or deleted without affecting the run, but hopefully nobody is truly considering editing or deleting posts lol, since that gets rid of proof.

1

Comment: Welp.

To clarify, a lock locks every post before, so yes, NoiceGood did ruin the run by "testing" it ...instead of waiting for clarification lol.

Also, NoiceGood ruined the run again by writing "?" before writing "Comment"

147

Comment: Arguable.

145 Comment:

Rule added Commenting "Lock" or "lock" means that any edits/deletions before the locked post, intended or unintended, won't end a run.

Lock

135

133

130

Comment: it's still there. Don't scare me like that lol

128

125

122

120

Comment:

Any interest in setting a new rule like "every ten numbers, someone can say 'lock' in their comment to prevent comment edits/deletions before the lock from ending the current count.

Another rule idea might be that someone clearly being a troll or accidentally ending the count because they lack experience in the thread could be ignored if we vote in the next comment (by likes) to ignore that/those post(s).

Let me know your thoughts :))

111