Sure, the game could do without them, but it seems fun to have them on there. Also, how do we feel about timing out the loads between each level (the part where it spawns you on a spawn point as an intermission)? because I've seen that loads can span to 6 seconds at my highest, but it is quite tedious to do so. If it's the tediousness, then you could just retime the top three in a category.

Well to think about it, individual levels were into consideration. but atm we aren't sure yet due to the update coming out soon and we don't really want to flood the categories when we have to change it to legacy.

About the intermission, these are ping-related matters and understandable. I wish there was an IGT Timer but there isnt. Retiming it would take a while, cause not all of them are equal lengths and we can't just start removing out 6 secs from everyone 9 times. If we are doing this we'd have to split to IGT and RTA, the point of RTA is that any loading screen or pause counts. IGT can be paused at their own discretion. for the moment at least we rank in IGT or we would Split the leaderboards to IGT Runs and RTA.

So, sr.c has an IGT vs RTA split already, you would not have to split the categories. You can just add in the RTA as a variable in runs.

That's the issue here, people would complain that they have a 50-second IGT Run but have a 1:30-second RTA. I don't want to cut people off their wins by ranking them by one of them. That's why I said we'd have to split it, Also mainly because there isn't an IGT Timer and retiming would be a pain for just 3 verifiers

why do you make every forum post in bold

also removing loads should just be the default way to sort the leaderboards, if someone gets pissy because they played worse but had faster internet that's on them

zir0nic good opinion for once gasp also, usually, loads are a tenth of a second or less. If there is literally a 6 second pause, then it would go down by a bit. this means that it would still seem very close to the original time.