Michael Chan's Cheating
1 year ago

like maybe stream for a hour and get a fast run

The fact that there is no real evidence and that no one can reproduce the bug properly and make it happen evry level transition

United States

@speeeeeeedy there are other mods that might be fine with the evidence provided. You are not the only one...

What evidence? I haven't seen any definite evidence yet.

but the the file doesn't consistently make the bug happen, so what is it proving?

Hong Kong

So let me get this straight - If you want someone to prove that their runs aren't TASed, do they have to make it consistently happen?

I've done all I could, I don't see anyone else having to do these proofs, I consider myself generous. speeeeeeedy is now just being ridiculous and setting up impossible goals for me such that my runs could never get up under one condition - where speeeedy is still a mod.

Other moderators, consider removing his moderation, if you agree, if not, I can't stop you.

No, I'm suggesting he finds a way for us to reproduce the bug consistently.

Utah, USA

It would be nice if we could know what's causing the bug, but let's remember that the original allegation is splicing runs.

If there is no way to reproduce the bug then it was spliced.

United States

This might be off topic, but I want to know how speeeeeeedy became a moderator. Does providing evidence prove yourself worthy of being a mod?

The reason I ask this is because I think speeeeeedy expects too much of Michael. He's literally done it on a stream.

If you don't agree, hopefully using the the file Michael sent will prove that he didn't cheat. :)

I know it sound like i'm asking to much of him but it is normally once a cheater, always a cheater, but I want to give michael a chance to prove himself.

Hong Kong

Just realised one thing.

While I'm proving my heart out already...

Did speedy use any proof to prove his rebuttals are legit?

All he's saying is that 'once a cheater, always a cheater'. 'You have a big yt channel so everyone likes you', and such. It's as if after his first comment, no matter how much we fully decode it and solved everything by providing literal past speedruns and even using my time to record a proof (not to mention how busy I am right now, as u guys can't see any videos posted for like 3 weeks), I'm just so disappointed that after his first post, everything he says is just not conclusive or having any standpoint.

As if we were students that are trying so so hard to get the assignments done, and the teacher just crumbles them up without even looking at them carefully, and throws them at the bin, ignoring the existence, and saying that the students did not do an enough job.

Luis_sm, we need you to be judgemental on this. We need someone actually caring about one's future, we need someone who actually has basic thinking skills, we need someone to determine right and wrong and where thus moderator shall belong.

DoubleSpratt, Swskrei and 2 others like this
Game stats
Followers
170
Runs
1,753
Players
254
Latest news
New Standards of Proof

Due to a recent cheating situation, I feel that top runs should have more proof.

  1. Any top 10 full game runs now needs a video of at least 20 minutes of attempts submitted along with it.

  2. any top 50% individual level submission now must have the replay code in the description or, if it's too lo

2 months ago
Latest threads