New Timing System
1 year ago
Minnesota, USA
Super moderatorChiken_11
He/Him, They/Them
7 months ago

im a little late to this...

California, USA

Dis much arguing just for one run of a game is crazy lol

Antarctica

@Sir_Farcelot, I have discoverd a discrepancy in the way you did your calculation. See the display in appel only updates every 3 frames which means that if I get 18.9 that could be 18.90, 18.93, or 18.96. If DapperScratcher got say 16.0 on one level and Michael get 16.1 on the same level that doesn't mean the difference is .1 because if DapperScratcher got 16.06 and Michael got 16.10 then the difference is 0.06. We can't fully account for this in the calculation but if we assume that Michael got the lowest possible time for each time he gets (e.g. 16.0 we assume 16.00) and Dapper gets the highest (e.g. 16.0 we assume 16.6) then that would turn the scales in Michael's advantage and he would have the better total time. So it isn't impossible for Michael to have a better run. But this doesn't mean Michael did get a better run.

CAKEC0DER and LionCoder10 like this
Antarctica

Does that make sense?

Vietnam

I have been mentioned

PolarYt323 likes this
Game stats
Followers
170
Runs
1,766
Players
254
Latest news
New Standards of Proof

Due to a recent cheating situation, I feel that top runs should have more proof.

  1. Any top 10 full game runs now needs a video of at least 20 minutes of attempts submitted along with it.

  2. any top 50% individual level submission now must have the replay code in the description or, if it's too lo

2 months ago
Latest threads