So, I noticed that there aren't any submitted 100% runs. Is this cause no one wants to run it, it's not routed, or no one has done a "good enough" run? I saw 1 run on the non-steam leaderboard. If my run isn't nearly as good as that, should I still submit, or is there a certain level of play quality before you verify a run? New to this community, so figured I would ask about it.

On a related note, should we start putting information on running this game into the guide section?

Whenever I run 100%, I tend to focus on the non-Steam version. I'm going to see how good I can get my current route, because the PB isn't good right now. When/if I push that to near its limit, I might go to the Steam version (which has slightly less backtracking). As for gameplay quality, there is no "par" for runs submitted to the leaderboards. As for guides, I'd be happy to start on one but it might be better to have all the runners contribute to it.

Cool. Thanks for the answer. I won't hesitate then on posting a run, though I might try to get better first anyway, since my any% run is pretty sloppy.

I really do think a guide would be super helpful. Maybe even a few smaller guides about specific tricks or even making a forum thread about it and then compiling all the information into a single entity for the Guides section. Not exactly sure which is the best way to go about it since I'm new to the scene.

Most of the run is straightforward so I don't think there's much value in writing a full guide, but I can see why having a guide that explains tricks and techniques could be valuable. I might start working on one.

EDIT: A route guide might also be useful.

A route guide would probably be the most helpful, followed by tricks. Maybe even putting a map into the resources. not sure how easy that would be.

Alrighty then. I'm now working on a guide of sorts, and have added some maps to resources. Thanks for the ideas. :)