RussiaI still remember 3 minutes being a lot on this, insane how far it got, gg
Quick update.
Rules are added, although no major changes have been made, besides separate Console/PC categories, same as MFPP.
Feel free to submit your runs!
The main reason is to avoid cheating in the game, especially given its simplicity. (And one of the main moderators @Forg1ven is very principled about this issue).
Especially for runners claiming a world record - they must be Reference so that this rule is maintained for future new runners.
Idk if this run is real or not but here is what i think
-
weird thing is that he plays with picture instead of numbers, that's pretty unusual, but anyway
-
scramble is very lucky (11 mouse clicks optimal), so the low time on it is expected
-
he solved it in like ~23 clicks or so(?), far from optimal, but it looks a bit prepared for me, red flag is how he moves mouse to the place of first move before he sees the puzzle scrambled at all.
-
and another strange thing is very smooth solution with same timings for each move, its possible if you are good at puzzle, but it may not be the reason of that. And if you are good, why doing such amount of mistakes in the solution? You can get like 3s (or maybe 2s without delay?) with that initial state without mistakes and moves are very obvious.
upd: also, another strange moment: if you are using picture, how could not you see the flower pieces (tiles "1" and "5") breaking apparat at the beginning of the solve? Such mistake does not make much sense to me (the 3rd mouse click is obviously better at the very bottom piece to keep flower together), and there is literally no reason to not do that other than solving 1234 without looking at the picture tiles at all, that may be just beginner mistake, but looks strange assuming you have the picture instead of numbers
my conclusion is that it most certainly may be just real average-bad solution on lucky scramble, but there is a possibility of prepared solve in it
