|
Of course everyone on the forums has seen: |
|
(edited: ) |
Spam isn't defined by how often it's done, but rather whether it contains relevant/solicited information to the topic at hand. In essence, if a user bumps a thread with nothing new to add to the conversation or for unrelated reasons, it could reasonably be pegged as spam. In that sense, staff could get involved if the periodic bumps on a thread get annoying. That being said, I doubt they'll do anything about a talk thread. There's been way worse offenders out there for you to get into trouble for this at this point. |
CatSharkedCatSharked, |
|
@MrMonshMrMonsh |
|
(edited: ) |
If we're being strictly technical, the thread isn't exactly about bumping this thread, but rather a question about bumping your own threads in general, in which case you could consider random periodic bumps as spam (unless they brought new information about said question to the table). Furthermore, if there was a thread that existed for the sole purpose of being bumped, we'd also have to ask ourselves what the purpose of it really is. However, as we are in the Talk section and there've already been quite a few pointless threads in the past, it's highly unlikely you'd see any issues here (and I personally don't have any myself either). |
|
|
When I saw the title of this thread I at first thought you were just going to bump it over and over. |
|
|
@PearPear that's exactly what I'm gonna do |
|
|
Good. |
|
|
I'mma bump this for you you can thank me later |
|
|
Wow it's been 24 hours. Thanks @ O.D.W. |
|
|
You are welcome |
|
|
Almost forgot to bump this >.> |
|
|
Lol imagine bumping a thread once a day, couldn't be me. |
|
|
Ikr, that'd be incredibly dumb |
|
|
Like who would do that |
|
|
CatSharkedCatSharked, |
|
CatSharkedCatSharked, |
|
Didn't get an imagine for today, I'll find one tommorow. |
|
|
CatSharkedCatSharked, |
|
CatSharkedCatSharked, |
|
|