Karnov Forum  /  Damageless
  burst_errorburst_error

I finished a damageless run during this magical month of Karnovember, and thought I'd see if there's any interest in creating a new category.

My feelings will not be hurt if the answer is no 🙂 It was fun, not drastically different from Any% but need to be a little more careful in some spots. I'll keep working on this a bit more.

2snek2snek and beerfullofbellybeerfullofbelly like this. 
  hirexenhirexen
(edited: )

That's exactly my feeling as well. It's not drastically different form any%, actually it would need just some small adjustments on level 1,2,6,7, 8 and 9, where most of them aren't even harder, but just a little of a slowdown. I think stage 7 would be the biggest alteration and challenge in it, but besides that, as said, I'm not certain, since it's just too similar run to Any%. Anyway, I'm not 100% opposite to it too, depends what other runners think of it.
Definitely interesting category would be low%, if someone was brave enough. That would be completely different speedrun and much more challenging.

beerfullofbellybeerfullofbelly likes this. 
  burst_errorburst_error

yeah I also think Low% would be neat. it seems like only required items are the ladder in level 7 and wings in level 8, correct?

 
  DragondarchDragondarch

Yup. 1 Ladder in stage 7 and 3 pairs of Wings in stage 8.

Also I agree with Hirexen that damageless probably shouldn't be it's own category, for the same reasons he stated.

beerfullofbellybeerfullofbelly likes this. 
  burst_errorburst_error

Cool, yeah all good with me. I think I will try some Low% this month, I'll let you guys know how it goes XD

 
Latest News
View all
No news
Recent Threads
View all
Thread Author
Low % Potential Rules
Last post
burst_errorburst_error
6 replies
Damageless
Last post
burst_errorburst_error
4 replies
Karnov Arcade Any%
Last post
SacrieonSacrieon
2 replies
Everdrive Save States
Last post
stormcrow56kstormcrow56k
2 replies
Karnov Inspector (FCEUX Lua script)
Last post
rainwarriorrainwarrior
1 replies