Ultimately, IGT with frame caps is probably the best way to go about this... We have to make sure this game is easily approachable and ANY extra work no matter how little, may deter runners.

Can you track both IGT and RTA w/ adjustments in LiveSplit? If anything, you can require that runners enter both times upon submitting runs.

RTA pause on in-game pause I think is the best way to go about that. Needed for streamers and everyone tbh. Life happens sometimes and when it does you may be on INSANE pace.

Here's my thoughts on this:

Cap 120 FPS - This is good, it regulates some of the re engine oddities. Idgaf about 60 fps or whatever, do what you wish to split cats

Less is more - Either run IGT as is, or RTA w/ in-game pause (with load remover as well I guess but I agree with Orch that it isn't needed)

Mods are way overthinking this at the moment lol

Sounds good to me.

You guys need to stop posting essays, no one readin' that shit. OpieOP

Anyway, if you need to practice: make a damn save.

Magnum route isn't that much slower than GL route. The only real reason you don't want magnum is no possibility of one cycle worm. If you don't get the GL in the RPD, you can still get it later on in the game. Magnum route shouldn't even be a category. It's mere existence is due to the whining of runners. carciSink

[quote=orchlon1]Adjusting drop values for dark souls would be akin to adjusting 4011, safsprin, 104. Grenade launcher RNG isn't comparable.[/quote]

wat

rng is rng my dude

I spoke to Dchaps about this previously and I'm glad he is pinging the community about this before releasing such a tool.

I mean, already using the "SRT" to view ammo and health values is already pushing it. A tool that would guarantee a specific drop is pretty much the definition of TAS. You don't see Dark Souls runners adjusting the drop values for weapons despite how infinitely harder that game is.

With that being said, I will ask that Dchaps only release the tool (with all other RNG included as well) to me and no one else.

Thank you for reading my post. dudsLmao

you have to sub to me first and then I'll tell you http://twitch.tv/dudley/subscribe dudsLmao

PSX emu runs are slower than PSP by quite a bit

Why rename Nemesis% to Nemesis Drops? :/

PSP used to be lumped with PSX emu but we separated it because it was so much faster. That's the way it's been. PS2 with FDS for RE3 is still slower from what I've seen.

Julian, PS3 runs should not be lumped with PSP as PSN. It should be lumped with PSX. PSP is it's own category cause of the massive time difference.

Oh, I see now. I removed that one cause it was a broken video (I guess that's the case for the previous ones as well).

Thanks for that. Fixed it.

Finished migrating all the PC stuff. I think it is starting to look good. I made post on the main forum about the subcategories breaking line . Hopefully they can change it so we can keep it looking clean without having to hide the miscellaneous categories or shortening category names.

Would it be possible to have the first subcategory be moved to a separate line from the [Filter] [View rules] [Submit Run] buttons? It looks sloppy with another subcategory under it when it line breaks due to the limited space.

Also, could the [Show all>>] be changed a misc. drop down similar to the main categories?

Thank you!

That Reddit post is by Enetirnel, is it not?

I've spoken with Wolf about the EA version again. He adjusted his game to run in compatibility mode for XP Service Pack 2 and advised that the game is running at comparable speeds to the Ubisoft version (which does not require compatibility mode to be enabled).

[Quote=Darazanjoll]MediaKite and EA are ripped straight from the disc to an iso, Ubisoft comes is a folder that doesnt look legit at all and we still dont know if the disc version keny got would be the same.

And if EA turns out to be the same or even faster then what reason would you have for not switching? If they are the same that means that the current runs on the board could stay but people would have to switch to EA cause its a confirmed copy and it looks a hell of alot better.[/quote] I believe I am misunderstood in this light. This was directed toward keny's question. I am not against running the EA version if it is indeed comparable in speeds (which your frame data confirms). In fact, I'm the one who arranged for it to be brought forth (shoutouts to faiarrow).

[Quote=Darazanjoll]I find it sad that I take this game way more serious then 2 of the mods of this game.[/quote] I find it sad, too. BabyRage

[Quote=Darazanjoll]I find it sad that they are incapable to reason or even listen to what the majority in this thread has said and still think that they have more authority to decide, choosing personal opinions over legitimacy and facts.[/quote] I'm listening. Isn't this why the discussion is still going on (9 pages now)? And I do believe that the actual runners of the game (which is the reason they are mods in the first place) should hold more authority/say over others.

[Quote=Darazanjoll]Putting Babyrage in every post and stream title.[/quote] Say hi next time. BabyRage

[Quote=Darazanjoll]Lazy to change the leaderboard so they hire a new mod to do the work for them. PC on fullgame leaderboard, every other platform on level-leaderboard and mercenaries is its own game? RE3 could look just as good as RE2 and that is not a personal opinion.[/quote] Some of us have a finite amount of time to spare. Julian is a prominent runner of the game and graciously volunteered to make the changes as it was his idea.

Also, I'm down for the board change. I think it looks clean.

[Quote=Darazanjoll]I have to say this, You should not be mods for this game and I could this way better then you ever could.[/quote] BabyRage

After reviewing the frame data I was skeptical since I have not tried the version myself. I showed Wolf but he still says EA is slower.

Wolf has run both versions of the game for a considerable amount of time so I trust his judgement.

I'm down for this. RE3 doesn't have to worry about different scenarios so it will look much cleaner than the RE2 boards.

I believed the arrange runs were inadvertently deleted when Julian moved the boards last time. Only a handful of runners have Arrange runs, though. Shouldn't be too hard to track down.

Let's be sure to make the difficulty variables precise and not lump Arrange/Hard together. This way if any changes are made it will be easy to work with. So we can have Heavy, Arrange, and Hard as the difficulty categories.

I can help with getting this started, I'll just get with Julian.

I can't comment on the Mercs - it's up to whoever runs it.

Update: Julian & I will begin changing the boards. It will take some time but the end result will be worth. We will also scrub for videos that are no longer working as well.