Inconsistent formatting of runs
1 year ago
Germany

As some people have noticed there are some new minimal jumps records, which are slower and have equal or more jumps, than previous records.

This means they shouldn't be the first place runs.

How did they end up at the top?

This is due to inconsistent use of the igt. The category is meant to have the number of jumps as th igt. Where it would be converted to a time in seconds. The runs in question instead converted to milliseconds resulting in a lower value for the igt, thus leading them to be the first place runs.

With this forum post, I want to appeal to the mods to fix this mistake and all verifiers and moderators, to keep this in mind for future runs.

For any run, one essential part of the verification process is to check for the correct format and fix it, if it is not the case.

Ontario, Canada

This is completely my mistake and was avoidable if I had simply double checked before verifying the runs, I'm sorry for not realizing the format of the submission prior to verifying.

I know my ignorance led to this but I hope moving forward the other mods (and myself obviously) can learn from my example and not repeat this ;-;

I'll fix the runs when I get home in around an hour, once again I apologize for overlooking the IGT.

Edit: The runs have been fixed now.

Bearbeitet von der Autor 1 year ago
Spielstatistiken
Follower
26
Läufe
481
Spieler
74
Neueste Threads
Veröffentlicht 1 year ago
1 Antwort
Veröffentlicht 6 years ago
1 Antwort