So with the new trick traditional RPG enjoyers are definitely being left behind if they want to compete since the new style of run entirely breaks it.

Countdown already mentioned the idea of splitting with the new route and the old route with Dynamo. I'm not opposed to the idea but it may make more sense to have entirely glitchless vs glitched, but I would like to hear more on this.

As well I'm not sure how exactly to separate on different versions. The smartest I'd guess is combine the unofficial english ones and keep JPN on its own end?

I just meant two leaderboards: any% and glitchless. Perhaps skip dynamo can be a 3rd if anyone besides me (or fattninja?) really cares to try and beat the glitchless time with it.

As for versions: if both English versions are slower (I assume this is true I don't know for sure) I'm not sure there's enough active runners to warrant anything more than a column on the LB (so we dont have 6 or even 9 categories), but I don't want people to feel punished for not learning the Japanese version. I'll leave that for mods to decide. If I have time Thursday night I'll do some rough timings of the text differences for both US translations.

Hello.
The behavior of the glitch used in my record this time corresponds to "Memory Corruption".
Therefore, I think it is better to divide it into three types: Any%, Any% Memory Corruption(or Any% No Memory Corruption), and Glitchless.

I think we can leave it with Any% and Any% Memory Corruption and I do like the idea of a tab for translation type.

So it would be
JPN(Any% Memory and Any%) as the main category
And
English(Any% Memory and Any%)
With Gaijin/2016 as variables instead of entirely separate categories if there isn't a huge difference.

If there is strong interest in Glitchless exclusive we can make that separate but I don't believe a Dynamo time actually beat the Glitchless WR.