SRC Revamp / SRC 2.0 (Concept / Suggestion)
Deleted
3 years ago
Netherlands

Thinking emoji

R0main likes this
Israel

For the moderator roles, I don't really get what it's trying to accomplish. You added a new moderator role and removed the verifier role, and every role is now rolled upwards.

I don't get what a game members feature is supposed to achieve either. Right now everyone can follow a game to get notifications for it and see recent runs on the main page. People who didn't run the game are already locked from making new resources, but they aren't locked from making new guides. I'm not sure if locking players who didn't run the game from making guides is a good idea; people might contribute their knowledge even if they didn't run the game specifically (and the mods can delete the guide in any case).

Locking players (who didn't run the game) from posting stuff in the forums of that game is a terrible idea. People can ask stuff about the game even if they don't intend to run it; people can ask for about tricks or glitches or general help if they want to run it but not upload any video; and also people may want help and clarification about rules and the like, exactly for their first run. Just look at how many forum posts there are in the main threads that we redirect to a specific game forum.

I do agree with being able to attach one subcategory (or variable) to multiple specific main categories. A "sub-sub-category" can also help in some cases.

Edited by the author 3 years ago
Gaming_64, dha and 2 others like this
Antarctica

Let’s just build our own SRC with blackjack and hookers

Difixed, bigcrunchbar and 7 others like this
New York, USA

In fact, forget the SRC

Difixed and Oreo321 like this
New Jersey, USA
  1. No one can remove the game after 2 weeks except for Full Mods and Admins.

  2. There should never be one sole person making the decisions. It's a community effort.

R0main, Oreo321 and 3 others like this
Canada

Revamping subcategories would be nice, they definitely feel like a bit of an afterthought in their current state. I'm not sure how I feel about "sub-subcategories" though (and surely there's a better name for that), I see the use cases for it but having them pop in and out of existence as you change subcategories might be a bit confusing from a UX perspective (and I think in most cases there's an alternative leaderboard layout that would be better anyway).

Everything else you're suggesting seems largely pointless. "Game Member" just locks people out of features with no real benefits, and "Head Mod" is just Super Mod with an exclusivity clause and a misunderstanding of how game mod teams are supposed to operate. As @starsmiley brought up, no single person is "in charge" and "making the shots". Moderators aren't rulers, they're representatives of the community.

Edited by the author 3 years ago
BenInSweden, R0main and 3 others like this