Theoretically this should be done here: https://www.speedrun.com/knowledgebase/supporthub/game-adjustment But you are right, there is no option to request changes to a series, only games (that you are a moderator of).
Try DMing a C-mod or F-mod about this, and see what their response is. As for what you can request to change:
- Cover picture for the series
- A link to a Discord server
- Choose if you want to show "unofficial" games by default (for example, if this is a series mainly for web/mobile games)
- Everything that is related to a theme:
- Primary color, panel color, panel opacity
- Set header color to match primary color or panel color
- Background color or background image, along with their relevant settings
Interestingly, the API call to get all users (without any additional filters) does not work either. https://www.speedrun.com/api/v1/users
If you moderators want to try them on this leaderboard.
Note - the images are in 540x96 resolution, and I have no idea how good or bad they will look after they will be resized to 180x32 (the maximum resolution for logos on the site).
@Laxxus I know a lot about the "short/trivial/notable" stuff, because I've seen many posts and discussions about this, and also had several games rejected for being short/trivial. I don't argue that the site has to draw a line somewhere, but the point of this thread is that "games that show no reasonable level of effort has been put into development from a functionality standpoint" is not very clear.
@Walgrey I never heard of a lot of games on the Wii, including Skylanders. By your logic, I declare that game to be trivial! Now seriously, popularity of a game rarely has anything to do rejections - there are lot of obscure games on the site.
@hahhah42 It seems that because this is a game from a game-jam, then the developer didn't had time to put sufficient effort into it (from the sr.c site-staff point of view). But, as Komrade said, if it's a functioning game that meets all other criteria, then I don't see any problem with it either. I would love to see some explanation for this rejection message, or how you measure it.
You will have to use the support hub for this: https://www.speedrun.com/knowledgebase/supporthub/request-moderation Read all the rules first. If it tells you that you need email authentication enabled, then go to your settings and re-save them.
Also wow, it's been like 20 years since I played that game in the past.
In Norse mythology, Valhalla is a majestic, enormous hall located in Asgard, ruled over by the god Odin. Chosen by Odin, half of those who die in combat travel to Valhalla upon death, led by valkyries, while the other half go to the goddess Freyja's field Fólkvangr. In Valhalla, the dead warriors join the masses of those who have died in combat (known as the Einherjar) and various legendary Germanic heroes and kings, as they prepare to aid Odin during the events of Ragnarök. Before the hall stands the golden tree Glasir, and the hall's ceiling is thatched with golden shields. Various creatures live around Valhalla, such as the stag Eikþyrnir and the goat Heiðrún, both described as standing atop Valhalla and consuming the foliage of the tree Læraðr.
Oreo cookies contain chocolate, chocolate is made from Cacao beans, Cacao beans are the seeds of the fruits of the Cacao tree.
@ChocolateTheGaming Some counter claims, as someone who watched this game in the past:
- Despite the name "Destroy the porn", this isn't an NSFW game at all. Have you even played it?
- The cool down at the end of the game is just a timer for the end part. It doesn't relate at all to how much fast you were in the majority of the game.
- The players can finish the last part early before the cooldown reaches zero, if they destroy all books fast enough.
As it was pointed above, you don't run the game (and know nothing about it apparently), so you don't have any say in it.
@CriscoWild The complaint wasn't about getting rid of inactive moderators in general. It was about getting rid of inactive moderators while there was an active moderator for the game, this moderator didn't request the removal themselves, the inactive moderators were available through social media, and the whole process happened because a random person applied for moderation on the grounds of no active moderators (which was not the case).