Changes to leaderboard
6 years ago
United States

Um... why did you post the same thing 4 times in a row, you know you can delete posts right?

Incheon, South Korea

I agree with all mentions above.

England

It would make the leaderboards look cluttered, You would have to add the other difficulties, It is exactly the same as Sizzling Threat except more brain dead and it would not add any more runners. If anything it would inspire more people to just run this instead of sizzling Threat. I am not adding it.

Cyberscore has a leaderboard you can submit to here, it even includes every single difficulty

https://cyberscore.me.uk/game/2259

British Columbia, Canada

Actually 1.0 Ultimate Choice would be cool. It would attract more people to the game.

OddPandemonium likes this
British Columbia, Canada

I think it would be interesting.

Avgn_Gamer likes this
United States

Here guys I made a poll for it, I’ll post it in its own separate thread

EDIT: Here's the link, the thread got locked: http://www.strawpoll.me/15664124/r

Edited by the author 5 years ago
Japan

The contents of 5.0 include all contents of 1.0. I do not think it makes sense to add it.

North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

With the slight difference that Meta Knight's cutscene plays instead of Hyness, thus making it more difficult to perform the quick(er) kill.

England

If I say I'm not adding it posting the poll again won't change my mind#

Go to cyberscore for all I care

Edited by the author 5 years ago
North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

I smell a mod abusing powers.

United States

Yeah seriously, if the community says it wants something and you do not do it simply because you disagree, that’s mod abuse

England

6 votes on a poll is not a community

Edited by the author 5 years ago
British Columbia, Canada

*7 votes If that's not a community, I don't know what is

Wild_Card and Kirbyfan66 like this
Switzerland

tbh, from about 100 players who ran this game 7 is nothing

IM_Cmac likes this
Switzerland

tbh, from about 100 players who ran this game 7 is nothing

England

Banned 1.0.0 in Any% and 100%. With the new updates out I think it is better if we all play on the latest versions, and on 1.0.0 the final boss has less health which would give an advantage to players to haven't updated their game / factory reset their switches.

England

Added a rule in Ultimate Choice where 1.0.0 is banned

This is because 1.0.0 freezes the In-Game Time during certain sections of the final boss

OddPandemonium likes this
Pennsylvania, USA

the ultimate choice category is kind of a mess now imo,Feeling like it should be (solo,co-op,3-p,4-p) just a thought/suggestion.

Norway

I don't understand anything?

Los Angeles, CA, USA

I'd rather not have 1.0.0 on Star allies because I'd have to factory reset my console and delete all my saved progress.