JapanAs a result, I am sorry for denying this tool you developed.
I think that the usefulness is high as the other person says, but since I feel that it is difficult to handle it has become such a position.
I like the tools you develop, I think your existence is very valuable.
Well, I hope that you will develop great tools in the future.
From the opinion of people agreeing to introduce this tool, I think that there is a negative impression on Magnum%.
Certainly, because the route is different, it may be troublesome to remember it. However, Magnum% is a strategic game even compared to ANY%, I think that it is very interesting.
Basically, when Magnum comes out, if it is possible to update the record, I will decide to continue Magnum% as it is without resetting.
And if you improve the record with Magnum%, I think that it reflects direct improvement of ANY% record.
Even though it seems that only the magnum will come out, the grenade launcher surely comes out. When I ran ANY% at that time, I think that Magnum% which continues on a daily basis contributes not a little to the improvement of the record.
I organized my opinion.
-
If the use of this tool can be hidden from others, I think that this tool should not be released.
-
I agree with the release if it is clear from anyone whether this tool is used or not.
However, after releasing, if it is possibly modified from others and the visualization may be impaired, I think that should not be released.
And even if protection against modification is adequate, I think that use on SPEEDRUN.COM should be prohibited absolutely.
- SPEEDRUN.COM has the category Magnum%.
If you do not want to reset by the appearance of Magnum, continue playing with Magnum%.
If you really want to put out a grenade launcher, keep on playing until you get out.
Resident Evil 3 was developed as such a game and I think that SPEEDRUN.COM should not officially accept that modifying its characteristics with third party tools.
Let's assume that only the adjustment of RNG of this time grenade launcher / Magnum has become YES.
Later on, someone developed a tool that can adjust the key of the seized warehouse and the quiz of the pharmaceutical company and will it be accepted in the same way?
Is there a persuasive power to the opinion that it is different from this?
After all, I think that there is the danger that if we permit the introduction of this tool, it will be a trigger for allowing adjustment of the whole random elements of this game.
I also continue practicing offline. Anyway, I will return to the competition of this game.
It is certainly the worst experience that Magnum comes out at the S.T.R.S office. In such a case, it is not once or twice that I hated the developers of Capcom.
However, the problem of the occurrence frequency of the grenade launcher can be improved to some extent by researching how to enter the zombies hardly to be detected in the basement, or reducing the damage by emergency avoidance to increase the frequency of entering the RPD I believe.
At first glance, it seems to be easier to get into the game by raising the frequency of appearance of the grenade launcher, but the game of Resident Evil3 is rather heavily dependent on the contents of subsequent luck elements.
As a result, competition to bring out good luck elements and rare luck elements will rarely continue, so people thinking that people who had given up Resident Evil3 with the appearance of Magnum will give up on continuing this game .
And most of all, because of the high occurrence frequency of Magnum, I think that the value of good record in the grenade launcher is high because this game is difficult to continue.
Honestly, I think that the disadvantage of lowering the value of this good record is far greater than the merit of raising the frequency of appearance of the grenade launcher.
I am sorry, my opinion is NO.
I do not know when the grenade launcher will come out next time, so I think that continuing the game even if the luck element is bad somewhat.
If I know that grenade launcher surely comes out next time, I think that resetting will occur frequently, desiring a better luck element.
Such a characteristic makes the completion of the game difficult in reverse, I think that there is a danger that it makes people who watch the game boring.
As a result, I think that it will reduce the appeal of Resident Evil 3.
There may be better ways, but I will describe the method I know.
By preliminarily setting the screen of Resident Evil 3 in the window mode with the same resolution as the full screen on the OBS studio and placing the LiveSplit at the same time, even if you play the full screen, you can record with the preset layout I will.
Since I have not been broadcast recently, I have not verified, but I think that you can broadcast the same layout with this setting.
However, I think that you can not see LiveSplit on a full screen PC screen.
So please prepare another PC and monitor.
I think that you can see the LiveSplit being played by broadcasting the content of PC's play with Twitch and watching the broadcast on another prepared monitor.
However, the disadvantage of this method is that the time lag of the broadcast will occur, so it is not real time.
I hope others can present a better way to you.
In the Resident Evil3 tutorials created by wusscake and jakef1891, full screen is selected.
And wolfdnc says that "Run the game FULLSCREEN it will be faster overall specially puzzles.".
On the other hand, supergamer57 says that 320 x 240 resolution is the fastest.
In fact, what is the optimal choice of monitor settings?
Unfortunately, I have not heard anything from the vendor since I ordered the Chinese version "生化危机3" last October.
I abandon the acquisition of the Chinese version.
Instead, I would like to procure Taiwan version of "惡靈古堡3".
I would like to report it as soon as it is progressing.
Everyone, thank you for valuable information.
Not only in Japan but also on a global site illegally slander people, your nature does not change wherever you go,, komakino.
komakino said,
@ Kenny
so? What has it to do with topic? Your head is OK, you?
In Resident Evil3 Mercenaries, Excellent Chinese Players play great score attack.
One of the legends of Resident Evil player, HKGoldenMrA is Chinese.
I respect him, and other Excellent Chinese Players, too.
There are certainly facts that Japanese runners can not use the Chinese version.
However, the concept of copyright varies from country to country. Therefore, I do not think to deny overseas runners that use the Chinese version.
Besides, I'd like to honestly admire newcomers who have recently shortened their records significantly in a short period of time.
Although this is a personal opinion to the last, I use the Japanese version , and I'd like to be able to run as well as excellent runners who use the Chinese version .
So, I do not want to separate leader boards.
I am sorry. Because the product which I ordered does not yet arrive, I cannot inspect it. I contribute a result to this forum as soon as I inspect it and was completed.
DudleyC_, will you teach the definition of "physical copies" in detail?
The definition seems to be different from Japan in the United States.
It really violates the Copyright Act in Japan to obtain physical copies of the softwares which I do not purchase.
I think that it is to follow the game industry economically to purchase software.
The act that only a copy obtains without really purchasing software, as a result, it obstructs the development of the game to spoil the profit of the game industry and thinks that it becomes disadvantageous to game players.
I want you to tell me how it is thought about this point in the United States.
Likewise, thank you so very much, DudleyC_.
Product information of AMAZON which you showed would greatly contribute to it if I could purchase for Chinese version officially.
No offense, but, I felt something odd with your some comments.
Possibly you think that I may feel it in the same way about my comments, too.
I think that there may be that ways of thinking of the copyright protection law are different in the background by the native place country of the runners.
Will you explain a way of thinking of the Copyright protection about the use of the copy of the United States in plain words if good?
