My opinion.
10 years ago
England

Yeah it sounds good.

Crimsson gefällt das.
Québec

asked snow about a NG and NG+ category for 100% but im guessing that it was rejected at this point.

Crimsson gefällt das.
California, USA

Added. Go wild.

Crimsson gefällt das.
Québec

@Jcstrickland89 i mean NG+ without infinite ammo is basically NG lol :/

California, USA

Also the variable was only added for 100%, so NG+ runs on the main board will be unaffected.

Québec

@JakePlisskenSDA does that mean NG and NG+ are on the same board??

Kentucky, USA

I said it was cool but I wasn't too excited for NG+ to be part of 100% But if you guys want it, it's all good.

Québec

@RE_Snow tbh it wouldnt be a bad thing to have NG and NG+ on separate categories, both sides have their pros and cons.

also i would have to agree with foggy here about adding variables without even letting anyone else talk about it rly. I see the infinite ammo variable as a complete joke and if someone doesnt want to use infinite ammo then just run NG, no need to add stupid things like that.

on another note, the rules on the doc and the rules on the board arent updated yet :X(rules on doc are pretty much final imo)

California, USA

I don't see what the issue is at all, the only thing I did was add a single variable that allows viewers to sort by infinite ammo on one miscellaneous category. Nobody has even run it yet and it can be changed at any moment. We can split it into NG and NG+, or not. The community needs to decide its level of involvement. I didn't change any "rules" as you say, FoggyTV, I'm not forcing infinite ammo one way or the other, nor does the board layout dictate rules. Just do whatever you want within the confines of the current rules. I haven't expressed any sort of opinion in favor of one or the other because honestly I don't have one, but if it gets people running the game, it's a good thing. Yet time and time again this community goes out of its way to conduct forum wars against one another and dissuade players from participating in and enjoying RE5 speedrunning. So if you think that these tiny layout changes are worth driving people away from the game, by all means, keep banging your head against the brick wall.

Outrage gefällt das.
Québec
  1. i never said your opinion was a joke

  2. ive said for about a week(at snow) that we should have NG and NG+ category but apparently he didnt pass the word around.

  3. just because a category is in misc doesnt mean you should add random shit to it, sry but that's not how it work.

4.no runs? there is 2 out there(from foggy and i), we didnt submit because it was done today and i didnt have time to do so yet.

  1. i support everyone doing 100%, but i dont support random decision like that one sorry.

  2. the rules about not being allowed to move items around in NG+(even SS) runs is stupid and should be removed, i will use my inventory as much as i want since its all part of my NG+ file.

Bearbeitet von der Autor 10 years ago
North Carolina, USA

No need for anyone to get bent out of shape about anything. It was just a variable. It doesn't change much at all.

JakePlisskenSDA gefällt das.
Québec

@Outrage the fact someone added that just because it was a "misc" category just prove how little they care about it.

California, USA

Not to continue this off-topic tangent, but the reason the no-moving-items rule was implemented for NG+ was that at the time the rules were formulated, the consensus of the community was that IGT was a superior timing method to RTA since it removes load times, fps limitations, console differences, etc. But since single segment IGT is invalid if you can menu to your heart's content, the compromise was made to disallow menuing for NG+. Since menuing is an integral part of NG runs, we use RTA. The point is that the community came to a consensus 4 months ago that the game should be run a certain way. We're not going to have a quarterly rule change because certain people disagree with the rules or find them unfair for their particular circumstances. The rules are staying the way they are for the indefinite future. I hope that is clear now.

As far as this whole variable thing goes, if it encouraged Fatel to run the game there's no harm in adding it, since it literally does not affect you at all. If you don't click on the drag down menu and filter it you wouldn't even see it. If I hadn't posted and said that I added it, you wouldn't have even noticed it was there. If he's not going to run the game(and I wouldn't blame him because this is what he has to put up with for expressing his opinion), or if it is clear that no one else wants to run without IA, then I'll just remove it. It's not a big deal at all.

Bearbeitet von der Autor 10 years ago
Spielstatistiken
Follower
1,347
Läufe
1,411
Spieler
490
Neueste Threads
Veröffentlicht 3 years ago
1 Antwort
Veröffentlicht 4 years ago
4 Antworten
Veröffentlicht 5 years ago
3 Antworten
Veröffentlicht 5 years ago
0 Antworten
Veröffentlicht 5 years ago
0 Antworten
Veröffentlicht 5 years ago
5 Antworten