Netherlands
SupporterI heard this event is pretty cool and you should come watch :)
:muscle_emoji:Before the change, "next.speedrun.com" was a domain that was used to test the new site by staff. (from Meta's accidental leaks lol) For example, could they not just provided some kind of access to this beta site for testing for (a group of) supporters? It at least doesn't sound like beta access would have been impossible. But a large part of all the feedback and bugs that were discovered could also have been spotted during some kind of beta testing.
The dropdown arrow for miscellaneous categories was retained from the previous redesign. I complained about it then, so I'll complain about it again now: I've seen so many people that had no idea this was hiding categories. New users do not get what this is for, and categories that deserve eyes are being functionally hidden from people as a result.
This would be a great thing to fix.
Sidenote, not really a complaint because I know the site needs to make money but it's funny how every redesign makes the boost button bigger and more saturated. Expecting it to start flashing on the next redesign.
I don't really think a lot of users even care about boosting leaderboards and all. To me, the perk in the Supporter plan that stands out the most for me is the ability to opt-in Beta features. But sadly, there seems to be little to no possibility from Elo to opt-in to new features like these. Which is a shame because it's simply beneficial to everyone. Even largely to them and possibly even the biggest reason why someone would choose to get supporter.
Hey,
Please heavily consider an opt-in beta for supporters for new site features in the future. This is beneficial for everyone.
- Elo can provide an extra perk to the supporter plan (A similar sort of perk is already in place saying "Get early access to new features in development" but, I suppose this.. doesn't count for a big site wide change like this? Why not?)
- It provides Elo with valuable feedback to change and tweak things to create a release candidate version.
- It gives users a good reason to even become a supporter in the first place.
Were video embeds in the rules a thing before? (Can't recall ever seeing that but my memory can be letting me down.) Someone please confirm otherwise I'll put that on the list.
I tested the abovementioned major bug and I could not replicate that. (I tried submitting a run with millisecond precision on. Then, I edited the run after verification and verified it again and it didn't subtract 1ms from that run.) Any concrete examples? @Aiivan
Test thread to test the dialog pressing issue.
@Camcorder np thank you for fixing quite a lot of things already so quickly.
We actually thought the embeds on bilibili not working were copyright or URL issues but seems we weren't the only ones.
I wonder if it's not showing for games you mod that you haven't done any 'actions' for as it's listed there. That list might pile up for users who moderate a lot of games though. Not really sure what the idea was there.
To be fair they should just rename that account and link requesting a game to the proper request form in the Support Hub. It hasn't been active in a year already. (Seems to be someone's alt as well)
I'll add those.
You can still see which games you mod though?
There are also some changes that I don't even know if they were intended or not, like the ability as a super mod to remove any other super mods (which is totally busted and I hope this gets fixed asap)
On my end (as a super mod), trying to change a super mod to regular mod or verifier spits out an error saying you cant change their mod status. I also cannot remove them. Not sure where you are seeing this?
