Iowa, USA@kabota1215 Who responded to you? If they are having password issues please have them send a message to Pac on Discord or Kirkq on Twitter. If they respond to you saying they aren't going to bother doing that, we'll look into this further.
@Hulnia Can you provide a direct link to the leaderboard?
Okay, but what about the literal platform itself? Every PC and Phone get updated parts/re-releases all the time otherwise we'd be here adding all that too. Nothing in your post says anything about the literal platform itself.
Is it going to have exclusive games that only work on this thing? Because it kinda reminds me of the Nintendo DS and Nintendo DSi, the latter did have a few games that only worked on the DSi....but it was a different platform. This seems to be the barrier since no one has said anything about the games other than mentioning ports.
I am going to post in this thread regarding this, I have removed the ROM download that was in resources (including the patch as I'm sure it was pre-patched), I want to remind everyone that uploading ROMs to speedrun.com or providing off-site links is NOT allowed in anyway or fashion as it is copyrighted material and can lead into DMCA.
It would help if some of you guys provided some sources because it seems to fall under as a more "sub-product" of well the Oculus itself and the wiki information on it seems real vague stating what exactly it is aside of being a new product....it doesn't really say if its an extension of the old platform or what.
I took T5MNC-IVZTL-R2BJP
I'll give this a spin over the weekend and try to give some feedback. Seems like an interesting platformer.
Also, not to double post but I am also curious if you would require a gaming commission license. Which even if you don't, if there are large enough sums of money I can't see this flying pass IRS with flying colors and looking at the Legal Notice terms and Code of Conduct is a literal joke that not much has been thought about.
Edit: Actually it's even worst, the entire operation is in Germany. The entire thing seems uneasy to me in a lot of ways already, the user also only has a single post and joined hours ago. I feel this is nothing more than a way to scam users, I'm locking this thread for the safety of others.
@Invive322 Removed the old moderator and replaced them with you.
@Flynntendo https://twitter.com/SpasmanGames - Contact the Super Mod here, they appear active on twitter.
@sopha Removed and added you as Super Mod.
@Aradije Post your problem under the Minesweeper forum of the game.
Future postings from you will result in deletion, you seem to be refusing to acknowledge anything we've got to say at this point about the "issue" and the "issue" has long since been resolved.
@TheBlazeJp This is the last time I am going to address your post and I will break it down.
"A game non of us have moderated? Nobody has moderated it. There is 1 run."
Yes, none of you moderated it and it had one user that moderates it that is not part of your series moderation.
"A run which currently is Incorrect."
In your opinion. If something is wrong with it, you should have directly attempted to contact the moderator of the game to explain the situation and issue originally.
"The game has been out for 3 months and there is only 1 run and leaderboard which has been set up wrong."
The length of time a game has been released has nothing to do with the boards moderation. See my above reply for the rest of that answer.
"This is even more evident considering the single category and the only run in the Trials Rising section currently is an Illegal run because it uses content from a DLC patch 2 months into the game."
Again, did you read my above comment about talking to the super moderator about it "originally"? By now, you have but at the time you did not.
"Any% Is base game content. What was available day 1 of the games release."
Again, this has nothing to do with the request.
"I had every reason to make a post here."
No actually you did not. The first thing you did was come straight here and demand us to add you and the entire Trials moderation mods to the game because they didn't like what Jammy was doing and did not make an attempt to reach out or talk to them, something that did not happen until you had already posted here. At the same time, if we had manually added all of you, Jammy would be coming here to complain that we added a bunch of unknown users to the game and making alterations without him possibly knowing.
"Trials Games havent changed much in their structure over the years and don't have clear timing points for categories and category guidelines."
....You can see why I posted two of the Trials games and pointing out how those couple of games are being neglected. You wanted to alter rules on this game....didn't want to set any for the existing games....this is a red flag.
"Which is why Mod experience from past games is very beneficial."
Every game is different and mod experience from different games to another game makes zero sense. That is saying a moderator of Super Mario 64 is going to fit in just fine with Super Mario Galaxy.
@TheBlazeJp I disagree with much of what you say and this has to do with how series mods tend to think as a whole, Jammy has gotten back to you and whatever he decides is okay by us seeing as how the state of the board was, actually fine. A leaderboard is not defined by what series mods think and I think that is something you may might to consider when trying to enforce future decisions on games none of you moderated in the first place, which again the first thing you should've actually done was talk the Super Mod about the game and I assume the others felt no need to wanting to do so as well but decided to just request (or enforce) all of you to just get assigned it.
You can see the outliner where it looks bad, even if it isn't your intent, it is what it appears to be to us. I personally don't care for the rant or the excuse being provided, I'm pointing out where it was unfair to Jammy and the original request. This had less to do about "you" and more to do with the "request/decision" made here when posted.
Also; "I created my Initial post because Jammys current Any% Wr Run is Illegal and not Any% but a seperate category because it uses tracks not in the "Base Game". That was your opinion, not literal fact. A leaderboard is setup to however its moderators feel it should be set up and if something is wrong/unfair/etc then it should be directed to the games leaderboard moderators with making amendments or potential changes. I also provided how two games in the series modded by Trials don't even have rule defined. No offense, but what you are saying here is pretty bent backwards.
In short, again, what Jammy does is up to him and
@TheBlazeJp Not interested in a rant and my opinion still stands, what Jammy decides to do is his own choice. Series mods do not "own" other game leaderboards within its series and do not get special privileges so where we stand on this hasn't/won't change.
@RNJesus Done.
@TheBlazeJp You cannot edit games that were manually added by us, have any of you made any effort whatsoever to contact Jammy at all? I see he has twitch linked, try whispering to them or at least post a thread under the game and give him some time.
There is no harm being done or any damage, there isn't other runs pending for the game at all, all I see this as is a few people wanting to grab a hold of a board none of them even run and trying to make up rules for categories of the game...that again they don't run (yet). There has been times in the past when we have added Series mods to games within the series before and it has created a large amount of problems among one another for the games. Also I want to also add that, you claim you are all trying to forcefully make rules for the game but then you have boards with no rules defined? https://www.speedrun.com/trials_evo and https://www.speedrun.com/Trials_Evolution_Gold_Edition being examples.
We are not going to revoke his Super Mod status at this time nor add anyone until contact has been attempted which I feel is completely acceptable. I'm just saying because its been about a week since the game has been added at this point. Hopefully this isn't an attempt to stir up a problem that does not exist.
Whatever works for you is fine, the applications themselves won't make any difference as long as both screens are shown.
See this thread; https://www.speedrun.com/lm3ds/thread/8fmky - In short, you will get 20 seconds added back to your submitted time because of the faster loading screens. 100% right now is still banned from using NTR. (NTR is required to stream from a 3DS, however NTR is overclocking its hardware to do so which affects every 3DS game and I would assume VC titles).
All the PC programs will operate nearly the same, but I recommend using snickerstream because it is better supported by its developer and is quite good.
@stew_ I moved your DM to another staff member, sorry I've been ill the last couple of days so I'm in no mood or condition to deal with anything at this time.
@Timmiluvs First time I've seen one of these actually become clever.
Time and again I have considered setting up a score based tournament of the mode because I don't think scarescraper ever gets enough love and there's quite a lot you can actually do to make it quite fun, this being one of them.
Basically you would have three objectives
(For the sake of variety Surprise mode would be used and all games would be Solo mode only, likely keeping it within 10 floors, you would have an X amount of time to submit your scoring and after which time you are no longer allowed to keep trying to get a better score).
Collect the most weight Collect the most gold In case of a tie, IGT would then be used.
You would want to collect as much as possible of the two objectives, if your opponent managed to collect more gold than weight compared to you then it would end up being rounded with weight. I realize this isn't quite clear but it is just an idea I have played with in my head for a couple of years.
My question is that is there interest from the community to want to participate if the goals/rules are ironed out?
