So my submission for Man the Ramparts was rejected on the basis that I was running a "modded" version of the game. I imagine this is because you can see the LupoMod message in the chat, which we use because it allows us to restart missions more frequently.

Now, I understand the logic behind disallowing runs like this, but does it really achieve what you want it to? The purpose is to disallow any mods that might alter the game, but this could be true on any of the 3 players who aren't the main video PoV.

There is no way to regulate what other players are using, so why are we basing the rulings solely on the player who is streaming?

I think that the only way a run should be disqualified is if it actively breaks any rules, or if it can be proved that a mod is active that is altering the game.

There is no good reason for our run to be disallowed. If we had a video of any of the other 3 players we could have submitted that and the run would count as being 100% legit.

Something with the system is wrong, and it needs to be fixed.

edit: In case it's not clear, the major problem here is the fact that a run can be considered illegal/illegitimate solely based on which player's PoV the video is from. That is, any player in the party can have any number of non-obtrusive/non-game-altering mods active, as long as their PoV isn't the one that is being streamed/recorded.