Non
I'd also be willing to open up a dialogue about 100% definition (re:trade sequence break) since I think one thing that kind of goes overlooked (or just unknown - especially with a lot of the newer people) is that a lot of this game's 'community' spent its formative years with only one or two people forming categories and rulesets. Although yes, it's always good to take history and precedent into account when trying to maintain standards for category definitions and rulesets, we don't have to be total slaves to it all the time. Especially in this scenario when one of the two people who formed 100% (Cransoon & Giuocob) as we know it is wishing to make the rulesets more consistent.
Just food for thought from an old boi.
Do I want to see SS duping added to a Hundo run? Yes Do I want to see it replace the current Hundo category? No
I'd say add in another hundo category that does allow SS duping so people can post times with it for fun. (Perhaps called All Inventory as Cransoon has mentioned) and it can even go in the Misc where Legacy should also be tbh.
So "No" to changing the current 100%.
If I get a vote (dunno if I still count as a hundo runner..... dont think I do). No on SS Dupe.
No.
Precedent. Logic. Consistency. Content.
Precedent should be of the highest priority when making new rules that handle the gray area.
No
(I dont have a time on the leaderboard yet, because i just didnt get a good run that i'm happy with yet)
But we should add a hundo run that allows it as a misc category as there's plenty of interest for that in the community.
No.
I havent run 100% in a while but i believe that 100% required collecting 100% of the items, not collecting the same ones over and over.
