This seems like a simple oversight in the rule wording that leads to a silly situation: If someone submits a run above the 1h40m threshold, including screenshots of the IGT and game version, everything is valid. However, if they also just want to include a video of it that they happen to have recorded as a bonus (maybe from a casual stream) and it doesn't meet some of the requirements, suddenly it's invalid.

A fix could be as simple as these changes: "All videos must include the following:" to "A valid video proof must include the following:" and "If you don't have video proof for above the threshold" to "If you don't have a valid video proof for above the threshold"