Ok, holy crap this isn't rocket science. I'm not saying that we ban the use of this "trick". What I'm bloody saying is that we just split them into separate categories. Why is that so hard to do? Let me try and explain my reasoning the simplest way I can. Say someone wants to play a game od solitaire with a randomly shuffled deck that is completely random and no "tricks" gone into it to affect the outcome. Would it not then make it unfair to then pit them against someone who had rigged their deck so that they can solve their game in 11 seconds? It totally makes it unfair. What about the person who wants to play normally? Are they stuck in an environment where they HAVE to rig their deck if they want to keep up? No, that's completely ridiculous. It's like comparing apples to bloody oranges. Please stop trying to defend this utterly confusing decision to have set decks and random decks in the same category. It ruins the fun for those of us to choose to run random decks. Seriously, how can this be so hard to understand?

Well hopefully it can just be split into two categories and we can be done with it. I hate to see all this drama over something the Minecraft speedrunning community has figured out ages ago.

I think that they should just be separated out into different categories. It makes the most sense, so those who wish to play with RNG are in one category and those who wish to play without it are in a separate category. It does give a clear advantage if you know what cards you're going to get than relying entirely on RNG. And for those who wish to keep playing on RNG runs then it leaves them at a disatvantge.

So all runs using the same seed will not be verified? Or will a new category be added for set seed runs? Would make the most sense to split them up, kind of like Minecraft speedruns do it.