Proper rank sorting implementation
but it's proper this way?!
you can't say 5th is 2nd when there's 4 people that are in front of him
Editado por o autor
This has been brought up before and yeah, HDK is right. The three fastest times (place 1, 2 and 3) are all 5.57, so they’re part of a tie. Just because someone later on has say a 5.59 doesn’t mean they automatically get second place because it’s not second place. Second place was a 5.57 and it just so happened that that was a tie for first. Same goes for third.