ArgentinaI agree that A Hat in Time has its fair share of levels that are linear in progression style, but you also have sections like Alpine Skyline that let you choose which objective to go for next (or just explore if you'd like), which is why I thought I'd suggest it.
Karoshi Suicide Salaryman and Super Karoshi have long been my two guilty pleasures when it comes to flashgames. The movement in both games is right on point and I just find them hilarious.
Big shoutout to Platform Racing and Platform Racing 2, I also played those to death.
I also forgot to mention A Hat in Time and Super Mario Odyssey, which while they're segmented in worlds and levels, each level is open and lets you explore the map to your heart's content.
Y'know, there's always that famous car-stealing sandbox game if you're on the masoquist side of things.
It's a bit RNG-heavy from what I can tell, but a cool game nonetheless.
Enter the pending run you want to delete (you can see it in your "Pending Actions" on the Hourglass icon of the site's navigation bar at the top), then at the right side of the run's description and stuff you should see three dots. Click on them and select "Delete run".
@2003041 I agree. Why can't we have both the stream AND latest runs from games other than the followed ones? Even if they don't all fit on the screen, I'd much prefer to have to scroll and be able to see them rather than have to choose whether to see the stream or those runs.
[quote=renkadam]I want help from speedrun managers[/quote]
If you really want to get in contact with site mods, you can go to the Request Leaderboard Moderation thread.
If they don't care about verifying runs properly, perhaps they should think about stepping down as a mod and appointing someone else.
I mean, it's not like we're talking about 8-hour runs here: the length of the video is merely 3 minutes and a half. Surely they can take the time to review it.
⢀⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀⠀⠀⢀⢴⣶⣆ ⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦⣴⣾⠁⠸⣼⡿ ⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉
Often times when people come up with topics that have already seen discussion before, we give them a stern look, mention that this is the case and then point out the old thread to them. When people avoid making new threads to prevent clutter and post on the original thread however, we yell at them for necro-ing. Isn't it a bit of a mixed message?
Unless the post is merely a repeat of the question in the original post of the thread or the new post is completely unrelated, I see absolutely no problem with necros, and specially more so when we only get like 10 new posts on average each day. In my eyes, it's perfectly acceptable to necro a thread if you have new important information to add or a new point to raise in the topic, as it helps to keep all the information in one place as opposed as having it distributed amongst a myriad of different threads.
That being said, I agree that the idea of a warning when posting to a thread that's 6+ months old would be useful in case the user is about to reply to a question from 4 years ago (in which case the OP's query would probably already have been resolved), but it'd be a Quality of Life kind of feature at best, not trying to enforce the abolition of necros.
I mean, mods are volunteers and have a social life to maintain, so when they usually skim through runs that aren't in top 10 to improve verify times, I totally understand that.
What kinda puzzles me in this case is that, even after being pointed out that a run's video is bogus (to the point where we don't even get to see the end of the game in it), they decide to keep it up just because "it's not WR". Unless there was originally a video showing the full game run (and I'd ask the mods again about this point in particular to be sure) or there's some other verification method we're missing here, it'd questionable at best to keep that run up on the board.
If you still get no satisfactory answer from the mods, like I mentioned before, you can always get in touch with the site mods/admins in the Request leaderboard moderation thread and explain them the situation.
The main thing you have to look out for is making sure the video is hosted on a permanent link. Often times people submit un-highlighted VODs from twitch that get automatically deleted by twitch itself a while after they are recorded, meaning the video evidence gets lost and the record invalidated.
To be cautious, I'd use youtube's video editor to clip the part of the stream that has the run and submit that instead.
1.61803398874989484820458683436563811772030917980576286213544862270526046281890
Please post Minecraft related questions in the Minecraft forum instead.
