I'm not a mod but my best suggestion for you guys is to post your runs here and then I'll point the attention of a mod to this thread if it's not done quickly

Typically, additions to leaderboards happen after runs exist, not before. If you and a "select few others" end up doing runs, the moderator team might come up with something for you. This way, the runners are able to pave the way for the path the leaderboards take, instead of it being controlled solely by the mod team.

lock this thread

if you don't sub 20 you're shit imo

So I don't currently have a PB video. My PB is a 39:25, but for some reason I didn't highlight it. That run as well as the 39:59 I DO have a video for do NOT use a skip in Spaceport that potentially saves minutes. Here is a highlight I made today for that skip. Feel free to work it into your routes, but expect me to whip out a 37 soon anyway :)

https://secure.twitch.tv/jumpyluff/v/78323012

The runs exist on the site, which is good enough. If you want to see VC times, you are in the minority. You can still filter it by platform to see the runs.

when i did my runs, i did superflame and all abilities. it's been criticized but i don't care because as F1 pointed out there is no point to doing it.

Please just edit your posts, this is crazy.

Is there any update to this yet? It would suck for the 56 to just be lost.

We require that there is possibility of competition in a game. Why is there a board for this when the game is private? Is there a DL link somewhere?

Variable rule is fixed. Otherwise, we could see what others think of the extra row. Filling out the other value will not be confusing.

Please elaborate on potential rules for "All Main Game medals". Specifically, what would be left out of a 100% run for this category?

I have made Meta Knightmare a sub category for both Any% and 100%. This will make the leaderboard a lot less crowded. No runs have been lost. Feedback is appreciated, let me know how you think it looks!

i don't know this game or have played this game or have seen this game much at all but it's clear that you should use subcategories for fixed warps.

There has been a dispute over whether to keep Any% NMS or whether to make Any% No LTS. I personally think Any% NMS should be thrown out as there would be more times for Any% No LTS already (3x as many).

However, I see the point to both sides of the argument. Could one of the mods make a variable for "LTS" for the Any% category? That way, No LTS wouldn't be a separate category, but the top time of 56:35 by Headstrong would still be displayed, as it would still be hugely relevant to the category's competition.

With this variable, the boards would look like this:

Keep in mind that this is already a compromise. It does NOT get rid of Any% No Major Skips. It also does not reject the idea of Any% No LTS. You'd be able to hide the unranked times by default, but still sort them out manually when viewing the leaderboards, but that's a separate issue that can be dealt with later.

nevermind, the 56 is gone, they already fucked it up, good meme everybody

i disagree with HS because no major skips is shit and arbitrary.

I'm not saying Any% WITH x skip, i'm saying Any% NO x skip, which isn't redundant. i just hope the mods do the right thing.

I'd prefer to keep Any% No LTS over Any% No Major Skips. Any% NMS is very loosely defined it seems. No LTS is a very clear rule, and there are more relevant times for it.

Well, the bottom line for me at this point is that I don't have video proof because it's not the record. I'm 3rd place, and my run was accepted without video proof before. Whether it's the fastest time you're willing to display for not, my time should be on these boards, """"1st"""" place, 2nd, or 3rd.

I don't care who had the idea of clearing the boards, you were the one that agreed and did it. Cait at one point did state that she would eventually run on console. I didn't know Hummel's time was on an SD card, but I'm sure that doesn't matter all that much.

As for my 3:20, I had bad Ripto RNG that killed the 3:16 and possible 3:15. I had ~60 viewers at the time and I raided Hummel when he was doing his runs. The run happened, people saw it. I didn't highlight it because, as we all know, it was extremely bothersome with hitbox. I would have if it was the record but it IS NOT THE RECORD. You say it's "generally agreed that the world record should have video evidence." I don't have the WR, but I have the fastest time you'd be willing to display according to the emulator rules. It's not my fault that the times faster than mine were suddenly rejected. You'd have video evidence for my run if you had made your mind up years ago. It's unfair for you to suddenly make this my fault and punish me by removing my time.