That is how the role was setup. There may have been discussion regarding adding some abilities like that to verifiers but I do not know where it has gone nor what it has led to.

Then he should fix that.

It likely fits into a series already on the site and the site mods want you to get the moderators for that series involved in it.

That is not a bug. All a verifier has the power to do is accept or reject runs.

Guideline is 3 weeks, not one week, btw.

There might just be a reason for that... but either way, you should add your discord to your profile.

@Radioactive_Man Generally series do not need moderators. In addition, that moderator was last online 7 minutes ago, so ask them. - https://www.speedrun.com/user/_-_STAR_fox_-_/info

https://www.speedrun.com/iktadaevan/allposts

Firstly, you're assuming that people don't get reasons for rejections. The real answer ends up being those people got reasons and just refused to read them. This has been true for the past half-dozen threads that were created for this reason.

Secondly, judging by the page you linked, it doesn't seem to be much of a game, so that is likely the rejection reason. I'm not site staff, so I don't know personally, but I'd imagine that's the reason for it. Perhaps (and this is also a common theme) it has been submitted multiple times and rejected multiple times (this often is by the same person to boot) and site staff has run out of patience for the game and is just a reject on sight.

Yet another thread on the pile where one of site staff will end up replying instead of focusing on what they could be doing :(

Why? No.

Implying the people who create these threads think of searching in the first place

Game submits should go through the game request form.

I guess that's your answer then if they're active.

Regarding the loading, not a bug.

@Twan_Jones I would love to. It's hard when they are multi-hour runs and your time is limited. I like to watch every run but unfortunately ideals are not always met and we must do things that are practical.

Indeed. If I get a submission that gets obsoleted before finishing verification, the top run gets verified properly, and everything after that I make a moderator note "Verified as obsolete" - this way, if it comes out later that the top run is, in fact, not legitimate for some reason we didn't realize, we also know the run verified as obsolete was not watched.

The runner gets their full history, and we get an easy way to tell which runs we properly verified and which were simply obsolete and verified for the runner's history.

Yes.

If there's an active moderator ask them.

Video is required regardless of run length.

Can only retime if the full run is there, though.