https://imgur.com/a/0xwfTRX I guess it was kinda stupid of me to use streamable but it was a really short video that I did within like a couple minutes. I'll probably just re-upload it to youtube or something but can you reject a run because of what site you post it to because it makes it harder to retime?
I would say yes, if the site chosen doesn’t provide an easy way to verify the authenticity of the run, then that’s grounds for rejection. As a side note, I’m pretty sure Streamable removes recordings after a while too so it’s not even that reliable of a hosting site.
Streamable sucks, I don't know why you wouldn't just use YouTube. Also yeah as @Timmiluvs brought up: [quote]Videos that are inactive for 3 months are deleted in order to make room for new content[/quote]
This is a much more significant reason to not use it.
That is true, streamable deletes videos after a certain period of time if the video has low activity as a space saving measure.
Although i would definitely say that the rejection message itself is rather rude and uncalled for
It may be easy to download, but that still doesn’t fix the main issue that after 3 months the video can (and probably will) be deleted from the site.