True that would open up a lot of grey areas, if its not a blanket statement every indiviual scenario would need to be specified so it makes a lot more sense to do it that way. Thank you for explaining!

Just to reply to VisionElf, I was specifying more to actually having reasoning for the ghost, such as using Salt to get Wraith for example, not just random guesses

I'm curious why this is the case, considering in the game itself we now have the ability to rule out evidence, it is clearly an intended strategy by the devs. If using logic we can figure out what the ghost is via what it doesn't do, why can't that count? Don't mean to sound argumentative or anything, just confused why that rule is in place