oh sorry I didn't notice it's that extreme. I guess it's not just a coincidence suama could almost get a new WR in the event.

I agree with the idea of limiting the fps.

According to the video transition animation is total 33s each day in 20fps, so 11s in 60fps and 4.6s in 144fps

I suppose the calculation of 20 min comes from difference of 20fps and 60fps, but we are not limiting to 20fps

The difference between 60 and 144 would be around 6 min, or ~8min for True Reset. It seems to be a meaningful difference. I didn't try much enough but I could notice slightly more click lag with 60 fps limit.

Personally I'm biased towards not limiting fps because the run is already a pain.

What would others think about this?

or if anyone's familiar with categories that take more than 4 hours I would like to hear about it.

why don't we make a discord server for better communication

I don't know what to say about the fps part, since I have no idea how much gameplay changes with fps change, in terms of both convenience and record.

I would say that as far as record isn't affected much, it should be left for runners' convenience, considering the performance of this game is already bad.