Madrid, SpainThank you very much for the quick and kind response VisionElf.
With the answers you have given me I agree with you and as a member of this community I abide by the established rules. Thanks to the explanation they are understood a little better.
Regarding the Wraith with EMF 5 teleport ability, I mention it because a run of mine was recently rejected at school where, thanks to the Ouija board, it is clearly seen that he teleported me since I only asked the Ouija board a question and it gave me back a emf 2 and 2 seconds later if I asked no other questions, the emf reader returned an emf 5 when it was in the lobby and the ouija said that the ghost is in a class room and there was no paranormal event. Attached link in case you want to see it:
https://www.speedrun.com/phasmophobia/run/m7wkrk9z
In any case, I accept the reject of the run and the rules.
Thank you very much for reading me.
Greetings.
Hello speedrunner friends.
My name is Misukun and it is a pleasure for me to be able to participate with this community of speedrunners.
I would like to participate and give my opinion on this forum thread.
From my point of view, I think the "3 evidences" rule is good and necessary so that this doesn't turn into a game of restarting maps until I take a picture of a phantom and get the WR, but I think it's too strict sometimes.
-There are ghosts that have special abilities that are unique and these abilities should be accepted as a substitute for these tests. For example, wraith is the only emf5 ghost with the teleport ability; If it's clear that the ghost did the teleport and returned emf5 in the emf reader, I think it should be accepted. I also think it's up to the moderators to accept or not that run if the ghost's ability is clearly seen in the video.
-Another thing that I think should be accepted is the discarding of evidence in standard. For example, if I am totally sure that there is no spirit box (which can be seen in the video that is checked), there are no temperatures (which can be seen in the video that is checked) and there are no fingerprints (which can be seen in the video that is check), it's a raiju yes or yes... I think it should be accepted.
-Regarding the emf of the truck, the emf5 can still be seen in it and should be accepted as evidence if the rise is 5 points and there is no one inside the map (that there are no paranormal events at the time that spot occurs ).
-Perhaps in individual maps the rule of showing the 3 pieces of evidence is perfect to avoid restarts until taking a picture of a phantom (for example) but I think that rule should not be so strict in an all maps (for example) since the The probability of being lucky enough to take a photo on all the maps is exponential and if someone gets it... let him play the lottery that day because he will not have more luck in his life.
In summary: I think the rule of 3 pieces of evidence is great but it is the responsibility of the moderators to interpret the video, the runner's explanations (whether they are correct or not) and have flexibility in it.
I say goodbye thanking you for being able to participate in this community and I wish you all a happy day. :)
