The variables filters are a bit buggy. This is a known bug that has been there for a while, but I don't know when it will be fixed.
Enough is enough. This thread isn't going anywhere. Locking.
[quote]but 'adults' should know how to behave better then that, I'm only a kid, and this is total favouritism[/quote] Because you're saying you're a kid you we should go easy with you ? That's where you're wrong. It's up to you to learn how to behave, not up to us to adapt ourselves to you. And I'm totally fine with xDrHellx quoting "dumbass" since you said it multiple times already. He's just adapting his speech to your level.
Yeah because you saying "dumbass", "jerk", "shithead" and more is totally fine. Contrary to you, the other people who replied to this thread are regulars that know how to behave correctly here, which doesn't seem to be your case.
Zer0z, please refrain from posting so many pointless threads, and even more from insulting people (or even "get them triggered"). This is a warning.
Well, I'm not a fan of having too many variables to be honest. Plus, there is no way to add them as images anyway.
I added the Class variable with all 12 classes as values. However, the boards will look empty until the runs are edited to have the variable set. I only edited my run so far as a test. I can do the rest later but it'll take some time since I need to check the vods (even though I assume most runs use RAcast)
EDIT : There's an option to set the default value (RAcast) to all runs with no value, so I did that. Runs that don't use RAcast will still have to be edited. At least the board isn't empty anymore.
This is a known bug that has been there for a while. However, the priority to fix it is rather low.
[quote]Honestly starting to wonder if Gyoo was paid off or something. You can't be this senseless.[/quote] Come on, this is getting ridiculous at this point...
[quote]Did Gyoo seriously like a post to support the idea that being a child rapist is not sufficient reason for a person not to moderate a leaderboard?[/quote] I would be very curious to read your arguments about how this has anything to do with the act of having responsibilities on a website where people try to be fast on video games. Because he may (Once again, I use "may" because I don't know and don't want to know more) have done bad actions in real life, it'd mean that he cannot do anything anywhere anymore ? I will not engage on dangerous grounds by giving other examples but I really hope that you get the idea.
As to having a second opinion, fine. I've asked ROMaster to take this over, hopefully he'll have a look.