Notice, I didn't accuse you of cheating, I am simply saying that I am still mad at the former removal but I accept the apology.
Also it's bloody typical that you get a 19.8 minutes before I get my 20.00. Do you have any idea how many hours I have to sink in friday just to beat that ._.?
Alright, friday or saturday then i'll get a 19.8 or less just you wait.
Wait a minute, that rule is literally a rule shouldn't it be enforced anyway...?
Alright, now how do I become a mod? :p
So you're saying in theory a mod could cheat and get away with it...? If so where do I sign up?
This rule is seriously flawed, considering the current nr. 1 dosen't actually show it. How are we to enforce this when some people are to show the console to prove something when others are not. Reminder that I had to run a previous WR. just so I could open the console to prove it.
So how exactly is the current nr.1 any different from my former run? Shouldn't that run also be thwarthed reasoning plausible use of the console command?
I understand your concern and honestly it does look weird. But actually what I was doing in my run isn't that hard, give it 3-4 hours and you'll start doing the same as I did.
The forums part was the only way for me to defend my run which you as moderator thought was fishy and is completly logical. It's afterall your "job" to moderate the runs. And of course I defend it because I used 3 weeks trying to secure the first spot and for it to be just taken away will get you fed up quickly.
I do apologize on behalf of my childishness by using missleading titles and thumbnails which stated the reason why the former run was denied as that was uncalled for. And if you have time I can show you live how I managed to do what I did to further proof it or atleast to reassure you.
But in a less serious matter did you see my predictions? "20.3 second run in 3 hours" It literally happend exactly as I predicted. ^^
WHAT DID I SAY 3 HOURS!
Well, Thank you anyway for atleast giving me the chance to prove someone else wrong.
B-bbb But what about the 20.8 then? It actually shows the proof ; - ;. Atleast accept that then ._.
Unfortantly leaving the judging to tHm has created this issue at hand, I would honestly prefer if all three mods were to have a discussion about this, because I actually followed the guidelines. As you told me I should run it agian and I did and funnily enough it was rejected even with the required proof.
Clearly you must see something is at hand here and leaving the judging to one person at this point dosen't work, EVEN if he has alot of experince in the counter strike scene.
An alternative to this issue is I invite tHmCS to a netcafe in Copenhagen and literally show him live that what I am doing is possible.
Liking this dosen't resove the issue, I would rather have a dialogue.
Now, I ran the bloody thing agian. Managed to get a 20.8 sec timer agian. I even showed the console command and sv_cheats being disabled yet the run still got rejected. Claiming a silent removal of the command.
You have to realise this is getting pretty dumb. Honestly, if I even show the command console which dosen't say anything regarding changing from sv_cheats 1 to sv_cheats 0 even using key bindings there should be a line which says I changed it. If I were to have a keybind spamming "gg very easy" then it would still show in the console.
Considering the fact that in the video I actually show the console and it says neither changing the sv_cheats from 1 to 0 meaning I actually managed this on a legit run there is no real reason not to accept it. also how in the world are you able to verify any runs if you're able to claim a secret keybind which magically both removes the console command prompt and changing the mode from 1 - 0? It literally dosen't make sense.
If by the same logic you can literally claim every run is cheating, by using a keybind. Furthermore I actually showed the console so I literally have proof of me not changing anything. If this is literally evident then I would like to make a serious suggestion of removing every run not showing the console, and then removing the rest anyway because they use a "secret keybind" to cheat.
I actually find this kind of biased agianst me at this point. Considering the fact that the current nr. 1 dosen't actually show the console and is pretty much identical to both this and my WR. run but is still allowed to be counted. And if the person truly didn't care about his record then I would find it only fair to remove it as it dosen't actually show the console to proof he's not cheating either.
Here I actually got an idea, let's get a third party involved. We'll let the community decide weather or not I cheated? Would that be acceptable?
But by same logic shouldn't the current nr. 1 be disqualified aswell?
Same argument could be used in my case with the I don't care about it. But unfortantly I do enough to refuse to accept this.
I'll just run it agian and show the console then.
Here's the proof of the 128. tick run.
Here's a video about the tactic I use which makes it seem like I don't spray
I beat the former world record by 0.2, one of the moderators choose to remove it citing use of no recoil spread. Unfortantly the moderator dosen't know the use of counter strafing, a competitive tactic that makes recoil nullified. This is done by walking in one direction and and then releasing said button and pressing counter that movement resulting in a full stop which makes your shot almost accurate. To put in perspective I use this to be able to "run n gun" throughout the course.
I also have the former clips leading up to the WR. which shows me spraying a few times out of frustration.
THE FULL VIDEO PRIOR TO THE WR WHICH CLEARLY SHOW ME SPRAYING AND ADJUSTING SPRAYS
