question with my rejected run
4 years ago

so i did a 5:06.81 in this game and it got rejected with the reason, and i quote "Rejected: Pretty sure run description says enough" my description reads, " idk how doing 1-1 flagpole glitch and 1-2 pipe clip got me rejected.... so here i am with a better run" i said this due to my last run got rejected for this reason. this is my 4th rejection with little explanation can someone please tell me why i cant do flagpole glitch and pipe clip in those levels, im not going to say who rejected my runs because that would be rude in my mind

Modificato da l'autore 4 years ago
Mexico

consider talking about this in the discord, as it is quite awkward hearing this in a thread

well this is the only place i could of thought of sooo, maybe ill use discord

edit: have zero idea what i am doing in that discord server

edit 2: also i dont care if this is in a thread i just want a real explanation to why...

Modificato da l'autore 4 years ago
Oklahoma, USA

Because you're cheating :)

Link the run in question and I can tell you HOW you're cheating.

Modificato da l'autore 4 years ago
Elohzee, Vicksland e 4 Altri ti piace questo

here you go man

Oklahoma, USA

Tbh I miss seeing these rediculous runs as a mod. Thanks for letting me have a glimpse back into the world of asshats turning in fake runs. Not sure if you actually thought this tas would be accepted or if you're doing it for attention, but either way - it's a tas and cheating.

Modificato da l'autore 4 years ago
hitzcritz, Elohzee e 10 Altri ti piace questo

ok thats better than the stupid like 7 word explaination thats all i wanted ok have a good day

edit: my last 3 wasnt even tased but got rejected anyway for reasons? still got those 3-8 letter rejection reasons for my other 3 and no i aint linking them

Modificato da l'autore 4 years ago
Colorado, USA

I don't understand why you think you're entitled to an essay from us when you very obviously submit fake runs. It's a waste of our time and we get a fair amount of these. It takes away time we spend verifying legitimate runs.

Submitting TAS, stolen, spliced runs is a ban-able offense from the entire site. Keep that in mind.

JoeyBagODonuts, hitzcritz e 11 Altri ti piace questo
New Jersey, USA

Not gonna lie I'm somewhat concerned that he's only looking for feedback here so he can create a more convincing TAS, he has like 3-4 obviously faked speedruns on his channel (my personal favorite is one on with the FCEUX TAS red arrow on the bottom right) so, it's obvious that this person can't be trusted, now I'm no authority on this subject but I expect all this person's future runs to be treated with HEAVY scrutiny

chickenboss36, sweatypiranha e 4 Altri ti piace questo
Canada

You TAS'd at least one. That's one too many already.

chickenboss36 e jag2791 ti piace questo
Singapore

You got the attention you wanted, now don't bother anyone even more.

nova99_, chickenboss36, e SigNastyTV ti piace questo

i never wanted attention

United States

So why'd u submit 4 runs :P

cashsgamingworld, nova99_ e 11 Altri ti piace questo

main reason - i improved

secondary reason - because this is the only site people use

Texas, USA

Dude the jig is up, you got caught and that's that

SigNastyTV, sweatypiranha e 2 Altri ti piace questo
Mexico

I probably shouldn’t be saying this myself but, you shouldn’t defend yourself when it’s a obvious TAS. and like roopert mentioned, tasing is a ban-able offense and this is not helping your situation

jag2791, LeonD011, e Lyren ti piace questo
Colorado, USA

It's called tasvideos.org bud

nova99_, Elohzee e 4 Altri ti piace questo
Colorado, USA

That's enough.

nova99_, Tomygood, e Lyren ti piace questo
Statistiche del gioco
Follower
8,481
Runs
9,763
Giocatori
1,994
Ultime notizie
SNES9x Ban

Effective immediately, any submissions using the SNES9x emulator will not be verified. The SMB1 mod team has concerns about its integrity due to its ability to overclock and remove lag frames, which may not be easily detectable. Additionally, we request that all BizHawk submissions avoid using the S

Discussioni recenti
Pubblicato 9 months ago
30 risposte
Pubblicato 6 years ago
1 risposta
Pubblicato 10 hours ago
9 risposte
Pubblicato 1 day ago
11 risposte