1. Arbitrarily deciding on point values based on player count just doesn't make sense. This has been brought up before and the consensus is that randomly deciding how good or optimized a run is based on player count is not at all indicative of the actual skill of the run. In other words, a WR run in a game with 5 runners may be more optimized than a WR in a game with 100 runners, so how would you assign points accordingly?

2. What does SRL have to do with this? SRL is not a ranking site nor an LB site, all it does is host Twitch streams from runners with accounts. It’s essentially a re-streaming service, so it has no bearing on this site or anything like that (it also doesn’t verify runs or anything like that on SRL).

[quote]2) What does SRL have to do with this? SRL is not a ranking site nor an LB site, all it does is host Twitch streams from runners with accounts. It’s essentially a re-streaming service, so it has no bearing on this site or anything like that (it also doesn’t verify runs or anything like that on SRL).[/quote]

Not entirely true. Leaderboards are being held there. See link: https://www.speedrunslive.com/races/game/#!/OoT/1

On-topic, SRL already has a ranking system on a game-by-game basis. And for SR.C, all I can think of is how abusable this would be. It wouldn't be a good idea, for the same reason @Timmiluvs mentioned about how to weigh different games.

I like the way The Elite have a kind of combined leaderboard of all the IL records for Goldeneye / Perfect Dark.

I tried to make a leaderboard for Streets Of Rage 4 but there was little interest in it so I haven't really maintained it. I'll probably update it every so often for my own entertainment.

I meant SRL doesn’t have LBs for RTA runs which is what (I think) the OP was talking about, so I should have been more specific. Unless OP was talking about a point based ranking for races rather than actual grinding runs of categories in which case that SRL LB might be exactly what they are looking for.