1.10+ Autojump (Continued)
8 years ago
United States

well this has turned into something interesting hah.

anyway, Thunder, the way you put that comment is a bit manipulative and while I can't say whether your words swayed the vote, it's not too far-fetched to think that the voting may have turned out a teeny tiny bit differently if you haven't put the extra "I put no on the first and yes on second ;)))". Then again, perhaps I'm completely wrong and people DID vote from their minds. I honestly wouldn't get affected whether or not autojump gets accepted, I'm just analyzing this.

Also, fatty, it may not be out of this world for people to vote no out of their minds, even though most of the arguments aganist auto-jump are invalid.

tiggz, strawpolls have made so many important decisions for us over the 'ages', and you're just looking at the problems of it now? I would've expected differently from a mod. Perhaps it's a bit of bias against the 'no' vote?

Anyway, that's a bit more fuel to this flame. Have fun, mates.

FatMan922, Maximus, e tiggz16 ti piace questo
England

was expecting a biased response. thx C:

Ontario, Canada

Very well written post, Craftain. However, I have noticed the possible inaccuracy of the Strawpolls for quite some time now. Just recently, however, have I became a Mod, and have begun to look deeper into every detail.

Texas, USA

I want more fuel

England

can we just stop and accept we voted no FOR NOW. IDGAF about your concerns on straw polls and the lack of reasons, quality not quantity ;) Do another one in a few months :/

Ontario, Canada

This is very entertaining.

tiggz16 piace questo
Texas, USA

If it's "quality not quantity" then wouldn't quality be the reasons for it and quantity be the voters for it?

tiggz16 piace questo
Ontario, Canada

Please, for everyone who voted no on the Strawpoll. Provide your reasoning as soon as possible! Poll ends & final decision will be made at 10pm (GMT-05:00) TONIGHT!! There are currently ZERO valid reasons for why Autojump should be disallowed.

(So far proposed) Invalid reasons: -You need to play on 1.10+ -It makes the game easier (anything related to this one is simply invalid.)

Modificato da l'autore 8 years ago
Ontario, Canada

Tbh, I'm in favor for auto jump. Its simpely a new addition to Minecraft. However, since when a new version of mineplex comes out, they remove the lowest version of bungeecord aka minecraft 1.6, 1.7 etc. Remember when we said de was so bad after leaps got weaker from upgrading from 1.7 to 1.8? It's really not that bad is it not? So what I think we should do is when mineplex decides to add a new version of Minecraft to mineplex, and from what I'm predicting they will remove 1.8, then we should wait to use auto jump for now until Mineplex upgrades to 1.9 and above.

I am all for auto jump. Its not our fault that Minecraft decided to add auto jump as they did in pocket edition. They obviously wanted to make it simpler and easier for people. The only thing that it is helpful for is going up stairs and their is not to many stairs in Dragon Escape anyways. It helps in many ways, but can be VERY annoying to. Why would you ban a feature that obviously took years to develop? It took Minecraft team took very long to develop when you touch a block you jump! This is a very complicated addition and should not be banned.

Statistiche del gioco
Follower
165
Runs
1,286
Giocatori
153
Discussioni recenti
Pubblicato 5 years ago
8 risposte
Pubblicato 6 years ago
1 risposta
Pubblicato 6 years ago
0 risposte
Pubblicato 7 years ago
47 risposte
Pubblicato 7 years ago
15 risposte
Moderatori