This rule is seriously flawed, considering the current nr. 1 dosen't actually show it. How are we to enforce this when some people are to show the console to prove something when others are not. Reminder that I had to run a previous WR. just so I could open the console to prove it.

So how exactly is the current nr.1 any different from my former run? Shouldn't that run also be thwarthed reasoning plausible use of the console command?

Now, I ran the bloody thing agian. Managed to get a 20.8 sec timer agian. I even showed the console command and sv_cheats being disabled yet the run still got rejected. Claiming a silent removal of the command.

You have to realise this is getting pretty dumb. Honestly, if I even show the command console which dosen't say anything regarding changing from sv_cheats 1 to sv_cheats 0 even using key bindings there should be a line which says I changed it. If I were to have a keybind spamming "gg very easy" then it would still show in the console.

Considering the fact that in the video I actually show the console and it says neither changing the sv_cheats from 1 to 0 meaning I actually managed this on a legit run there is no real reason not to accept it. also how in the world are you able to verify any runs if you're able to claim a secret keybind which magically both removes the console command prompt and changing the mode from 1 - 0? It literally dosen't make sense.

If by the same logic you can literally claim every run is cheating, by using a keybind. Furthermore I actually showed the console so I literally have proof of me not changing anything. If this is literally evident then I would like to make a serious suggestion of removing every run not showing the console, and then removing the rest anyway because they use a "secret keybind" to cheat.

I actually find this kind of biased agianst me at this point. Considering the fact that the current nr. 1 dosen't actually show the console and is pretty much identical to both this and my WR. run but is still allowed to be counted. And if the person truly didn't care about his record then I would find it only fair to remove it as it dosen't actually show the console to proof he's not cheating either.

I beat the former world record by 0.2, one of the moderators choose to remove it citing use of no recoil spread. Unfortantly the moderator dosen't know the use of counter strafing, a competitive tactic that makes recoil nullified. This is done by walking in one direction and and then releasing said button and pressing counter that movement resulting in a full stop which makes your shot almost accurate. To put in perspective I use this to be able to "run n gun" throughout the course.

I also have the former clips leading up to the WR. which shows me spraying a few times out of frustration.

THE FULL VIDEO PRIOR TO THE WR WHICH CLEARLY SHOW ME SPRAYING AND ADJUSTING SPRAYS