Not denying that USB Loader was a fair decision or anything, I'm just saying that it's the same principle of things changing.

What? Just because something was decided years ago has no bearing on the current situation and undeniable facts. USB Loader was decided to be banned after having been allowed for years. This may be an advocation to allow something rather than ban it, but my point is that things change with time as more facts come out. Its not dying; dying loses time. This saves time because its a strategy, not a mishap such as dying.

I dont see anything wrong with allowing it. Its not a major skip at all, so I dont see the harm.