Canada@Nolyswag I think the conjugation error was intentional. The title first starts with "i tried to pay attention", then tells what really happened (the converse). While "attention paid me" is certainly the grammatically correct phrasing, "attention payed me" is slightly funnier in that it more effectively recycles the "pay" word from the beginning of the title, since "payed" looks much closer to "pay" than "paid" does. The reason it is slightly funnier is that it does a better job at nailing the fact that the roles really were reversed ('i paid attention' vs. 'attention paid me') and nothing else, but the only reason it's humorous at all is because "payed" is not a real word, indicating there was a conscious effort to rephrase "i tried to pay attention" into something structured exactly the same with the roles reversed (minus the "tried to" part).
Upon further analysis it is obvious that the title is a silly joke, as "attention payed me" does not make sense; attention is abstract and not something that can "pay". This means the runner was stating something nonsensical in order to try to be funny. Therefore, it is even more likely that the conjugational error, which was also meant to be funny, was actually intentional.
Despite this, you decided to make a comment correcting the runner in this typo. You also left the same comment under the YouTube video, which importantly, is unlisted. Because the video is unlisted and only posted here, very few if any people would actually click through the video and read its comment section. But the author of the video is almost certain to receive a notification of the comment. Therefore, you directly sent a message to the runner notifying them of their mistake, which alone is a sweet albeit somewhat cold gesture. But then, you followed with a comment here, on its corresponding speedrun.com page, where nearly everyone will watch the video and most will read the comments. Publicly correcting someone on a comment board such as this without any other input (such as a compliment about the runner's skill, or verifying the run) could be seen as a short-term nab for clout, since if you had good intent you would trust that the runner would fix their title promptly, rendering your comment useless in the long-term.
However, the public comment on speedrun.com suggests that the personal message on the YouTube video's comment section was not made in good faith. It seems most clear that you specifically wanted to poke at the runner for having made a typo in their title, and reap the rewards of minimal reactions from this tight-knit consolidated community. You never intended to harmlessly correct the runner's title, you wanted to tick at them just for laughs. All the while, the typo was not even intentional, making you look like a fool.
since when were library routes that good??
also where's the T-key? cross-key? i thought those were guaranteed?
This run only had 3 generator rooms: 100, last figure room, and double basement. Posting here because I want this to get more attention. Is this the best example of godly room gen we have?
"Can i use a Game mecanic that is inside the game" is the forums question ofc yes such a dumb question
doors speedrunner try not to be a dick challenge (99% fail)
here are some counterexamples:
- revives are a game mechanic that are not allowed
- rifts are a game mechanic that are not allowed
- carrying items from backdoor to floor1 and floor1 to floor2 is a game mechanic that is not allowed
- carrying items from floor1 to rooms is allowed
- jeff shop is allowed in the category called "no shop"
asking if you can drop items between players is a perfectly legitimate question, especially since this is for a new strat, because it would suck to get a run rejected due to obscure rules
learn to keep thoughts to yourself
Every other top game on Roblox can be played basically infinitely, like pet sim 99, brookhaven, bedwars, etc. DOORS is still one of the biggest, if not the biggest, Roblox game with a limited amount of content (like 2 hours worth, 5-7 if you include Rooms and such). It's unfair to compare DOORS to other games that can consistently hold more players or to expect it to hold 100k+ peak concurrent players.
Also, 100k+ peak concurrent players is a lot - that's millions of unique players in a single day. There aren't enough people in the world to keep that up. It's already crazy how DOORS has held 10k+ players for so long.
It's also still consistently one of the top games on Roblox by player count, despite not really being replayable.
I'd imagine people who beat the game once and left (or anyone who was interested in the game) only want to hear about an update to the story (hotel+ or floor 2). The Backdoor, Super Hard Mode, and the Modifiers update were advertised as small minigames and not part of the story. You can pretty easily tell what people actually care about in #doors in the LSplash discord, anything pertaining to floor 2 or even hotel+ has much more reactions than anything else.
DOORS is very well-known - there are over 40,000,000 people with the 10 deaths badge. It won't flop.
if that's recent, resubmit because i thought the ban list was cleared
