Hello everyone.

The options we have right now are to move to a new LRT or continue using the current LRT, but new options and solutions may come up depending on your opinions.

In fact, this is a topic that has been discussed for a long time. As sawken mentioned, the current LRT has some bugs, and the new LRT does not have any bugs, but it does have some drawbacks. I am also concerned that the extent of these bugs may vary depending on your PC.

  current LRT

In my case, it turned out that my time was being added extra. There were sections where the new LRT times were faster than the current LRT. It is not usual for this to happen with timers that just have the frame counter removed. The topic of 61FPS was brought up earlier, and it seems that on my PC the FPS stays at 61FPS relatively often, which may be the reason. In fact, the time difference between LRT and IGT in my records is the smallest among players who have optimized NGPRO. My PC is not low spec, but it is not high spec either. However, we found out a few hours ago that this may be solvable. I was able to use a tool to prevent the FPS from going above 60FPS, so this could be a possible solution. We also found that setting an upper limit for the frame rate reduces the blur of the frame rate during loading. As for the "fake timesave", I'm not going to discuss it here because I'm not a proofreader or a programmer. I think it would be better to have the timer developers and luis, who has done a lot of verification, discuss the problems of the current LRT including this problem objectively. I think it is very important for everyone to listen to and consider their opinions as well.

   new LRT

As sawken already mentioned, this is a "pay to win" situation because the difference in your PC load time will be reflected in your time.

This is a much more difficult issue than you might think. There is still a lot of testing and verification to be done. The more you help test, the better chance we have of making it better.