Baltimore, MD, USAit will happen eventually
you can either have milliseconds or no milliseconds, it's just how the site works
But they were clearly fake and shouldn't have been accepted in the first place
the problem is when they're all literally one second away from each other
[big][big][big][big]whoa hold on[/big][/big][/big][/big]
Looking at his sum of best segments, it still doesn't seem likely.
I see your point
https://www.cyberscore.me.uk/chart/150628 Here's a link to another leaderboard for the game I was trying to submit. What's the difference between these scores on cyberscore and times on srcom? Are you saying most scores on cyberscore are fake?
"Video proof is required for runs of 1:20:00 or better." Isn't it strange that at exactly one second after 1:20:00, there are three tied runs with no video? Joe_HS joined the site 26 days ago, submitted only one run of this game, and hasn't been online since. noahdaly joined the site 8 days ago, submitted only one run, and left. djizz91 is less suspicious, as he's at least submitted more than one run, and at least he's been active, but it's still quite strange that he would get a run with no video at the exact minimum possible time you can have a run with no video.
I could be wrong, who knows, but I think these are probably fake.
can we just let this die
I can still see how picture proof could easily be faked in photoshop, but everything can be faked. No form of proof is perfect
@Timmiluvs I'm talking about a picture of IGT, not just a picture of the end screen of a game @KomradeKontroll Even though someone has picture proof of a time you still say it's definitely fake?
It was decided that the category was too arbitrary to be on this leaderboard (especially with that many runs) It would be a bit strange to have a quick marathon category with more runs than the game currently has to be on here
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/164506124/ It's Like The Actual Super Mario Odyssey Game
