It seemed silly to me that there was a category (in this case, 100%, which refers to playing through the 9th inning) that didn't have a win condition; wins and losses were all submitted to the same category. With that in mind, I have created a new 100% category that requires the player to win the game. All previous runs that were player wins have been moved to the new category. The old category will remain, with the requirement for future submissions that the player lose the game.

I'd actually suggest putting any% at the front of the board. The more I think about it, it's a much more difficult run execution-wise and generally speaking, there's little reason to favor having to play the entire game over someone who wins faster.

Also, this game is about robot violence, and 100% avoids that while any% embraces it :D

In terms of what would be considered the "main category" of the game, I 100% agree, and I'm perfectly happy to put the main category in front.

While we’re at it, why not just rename them “Open Mode” and do sub-cats for Win / Lose? Or at least “Open Mode (Win)” and “Open Mode (Lose)”? 100% here is so misleading and strange. XD

100% is a indeed strange title for a single game of baseball lol. I changed them to the often-used "Win a game" and "Lose a game" with a 9-innings note.

Someone brought up to me that in any% it doesn't designate that you have to win the match. Perhaps that should be added? It will obviously be a terrible time if you lose, but it feels weird for it to even be an option.

It feels weird to me that there are categories where losing is the goal at all. (For some reason, this is especially prominent in baseball games.) I am happy to add clarification that the player is required to win the game.