"Video proof is required for runs of 1:20:00 or better." Isn't it strange that at exactly one second after 1:20:00, there are three tied runs with no video? Joe_HS joined the site 26 days ago, submitted only one run of this game, and hasn't been online since. noahdaly joined the site 8 days ago, submitted only one run, and left. djizz91 is less suspicious, as he's at least submitted more than one run, and at least he's been active, but it's still quite strange that he would get a run with no video at the exact minimum possible time you can have a run with no video.
I could be wrong, who knows, but I think these are probably fake.
they are, someone would most likely record if they were close to needing video.
They definitely are suspicious, but I don't think there should be done anything about it. Runs worse than 1:20 aren't really relevant for the leaderboards and if anyone cheats and there is no real prove for it, just let them. It won't change that much. I don't know why anyone would cheat to be in a (quite bad place of a) leaderboard, because I don't think that it feels good or anything to be there without deserving it.
Well, I mean I didn't record until I was at like 1:17. I had no capture card and they are pretty expensive. But 3 people tied with no video, at least the two which are not active are really suspicous, but there shouldn't be done anything about it unless there is certain prove imo. I don't want to know how many runs are actually fake on all leaderboards on this website.
Maybe they all realized they were on pace for sub 1:20 and wasted time to not require video OpieOP
