Question about a possible new WR
5 years ago
New Hampshire, USA

I was playing 50 tiles in hopes of getting to 6 seconds when I realized I was never beating my best time. I checked my best time to find that it was 0.147 seconds! I reopened the app to make sure it wasn't some visual error. Lo and behold it wasn't.

My question is if this time has any merit in being submitted. I am unable to produce any video of the run (I haven't played since before the video rule change), but I am able to produce video of me showing the time using another phone's camera.

Victoria, Australia

If you can't beat 6 seconds it's 100% physically impossible you got 0.1 seconds. Pretty sure your phone just lagged out REALLY hard in just the right place to get you that run.

Pear, SaturnTheWolf, and Gaster like this
New Hampshire, USA

So you'd say it's an illegitimate run?

Ontario, Canada

Of course its not a real time. Besides you need video proof for WRs

Łódzkie, Poland

50 tiles in 0.1 seconds equals to 500 tps. That's obviously not physically possible for a human.

Mosaic, Pear and 3 others like this
Canada
Zoe
She/Her, They/Them
4 years ago

It’s a glitch with the device and lag, this causes many insignificant times being produced, I do think that merits a postable score on cyberscore but not here

Game stats
Followers
242
Runs
2,511
Players
556
Latest news
Incorrectly Approved Runs

Hello,

After a weeks-long investigation, many of the top 3 times on the Piano Tiles 1 SRC page were incorrectly approved by Darrel, myself, and past moderators over the past couple of years. After 11/19/2020, we implemented a rule that all top 3 runs in any category required video proof, and since

6 months ago
Latest threads
Posted 1 year ago
2 replies
Posted 1 year ago
2 replies
Posted 2 years ago
2 replies
Posted 3 years ago
0 replies
Moderators