Regarding the last run.
8 years ago

Now, I ran the bloody thing agian. Managed to get a 20.8 sec timer agian. I even showed the console command and sv_cheats being disabled yet the run still got rejected. Claiming a silent removal of the command.

You have to realise this is getting pretty dumb. Honestly, if I even show the command console which dosen't say anything regarding changing from sv_cheats 1 to sv_cheats 0 even using key bindings there should be a line which says I changed it. If I were to have a keybind spamming "gg very easy" then it would still show in the console.

Considering the fact that in the video I actually show the console and it says neither changing the sv_cheats from 1 to 0 meaning I actually managed this on a legit run there is no real reason not to accept it. also how in the world are you able to verify any runs if you're able to claim a secret keybind which magically both removes the console command prompt and changing the mode from 1 - 0? It literally dosen't make sense.

If by the same logic you can literally claim every run is cheating, by using a keybind. Furthermore I actually showed the console so I literally have proof of me not changing anything. If this is literally evident then I would like to make a serious suggestion of removing every run not showing the console, and then removing the rest anyway because they use a "secret keybind" to cheat.

I actually find this kind of biased agianst me at this point. Considering the fact that the current nr. 1 dosen't actually show the console and is pretty much identical to both this and my WR. run but is still allowed to be counted. And if the person truly didn't care about his record then I would find it only fair to remove it as it dosen't actually show the console to proof he's not cheating either.

derp likes this

Liking this dosen't resove the issue, I would rather have a dialogue.

Wales

I've said 'm going to leave this to tHm, I think it should be valid, I agree that if you have a bind to change "sv_cheats" you will have a line of text. If I accept your run, tHm will take it down.

AkitsuMaru likes this
Wales

However for the sake of argument I won't give you the WR for your 20.3, both you and tHm seem fishy however I think you're both legit, but tHm won't agree, so until you use the same evidence as your 20.8 for a WR I will not accept it.

Best of luck! :D

AkitsuMaru likes this

Unfortantly leaving the judging to tHm has created this issue at hand, I would honestly prefer if all three mods were to have a discussion about this, because I actually followed the guidelines. As you told me I should run it agian and I did and funnily enough it was rejected even with the required proof.

Clearly you must see something is at hand here and leaving the judging to one person at this point dosen't work, EVEN if he has alot of experince in the counter strike scene.

An alternative to this issue is I invite tHmCS to a netcafe in Copenhagen and literally show him live that what I am doing is possible.

B-bbb But what about the 20.8 then? It actually shows the proof ; - ;. Atleast accept that then ._.

Wales

I accepted the 20.8 and I'll talk to CtrlTab.

AkitsuMaru likes this

Thank you, I'll see you in three hours with a new 20.3 run ; - ;

derp likes this
Wales

ahaha good luck man, remember to show the console ;)

WHAT DID I SAY 3 HOURS!

Well, Thank you anyway for atleast giving me the chance to prove someone else wrong.

derp likes this
Saint Helena

I've been mostly staying out of this (for good reason and due to having a busy schedule) but I should really chime in on this.

I too was in belief that your runs were "weird" looking in the sense that the things you seemed to be doing were too consistent and in general just hard to believe. But I don't really have the evidence to go against your claim for World Record as you have followed the guidelines to the full. So until I can think of a proper way to resolve this with BOTH moderators, I will still be sitting out.

I will say though that going off in the forums against a moderator really doesn't help anything. I respect you having your opinion about what's happened and tHm having his but some posts just aren't really relevant and only really cause trouble.

Best of luck in the future, hope to be in contact soon

AkitsuMaru likes this

I understand your concern and honestly it does look weird. But actually what I was doing in my run isn't that hard, give it 3-4 hours and you'll start doing the same as I did.

The forums part was the only way for me to defend my run which you as moderator thought was fishy and is completly logical. It's afterall your "job" to moderate the runs. And of course I defend it because I used 3 weeks trying to secure the first spot and for it to be just taken away will get you fed up quickly.

I do apologize on behalf of my childishness by using missleading titles and thumbnails which stated the reason why the former run was denied as that was uncalled for. And if you have time I can show you live how I managed to do what I did to further proof it or atleast to reassure you.

But in a less serious matter did you see my predictions? "20.3 second run in 3 hours" It literally happend exactly as I predicted. ^^

København, Denmark

I should check the forums on this website a lot more, being called out and everything. In regards to your run, a moderator has accepted it, and I'll leave it at that. My personal opinion doesn't matter anyway.

København, Denmark

Also, on a side note, I might be done with doing gun range runs, I feel like those times I've gotten now are quite respectable. We'll see though.

Game stats
Followers
1,162
Runs
2,498
Players
1,090
Latest threads
Posted 5 years ago
1 reply
Posted 6 years ago
18 replies
Posted 8 years ago
3 replies
Posted 8 years ago
17 replies
Posted 5 months ago
0 replies