So I just got the WRs in 200cc Itemless- both 32 track and 48 track.
Why the big cut from my previous 48 track PB of 1:33:30? When I got that old PB, it was 3rd place, which was 8 seconds faster that Bison in 4th (I wanted to beat all other times using internal memory before I experimented with this stuff). However, I noticed that my times were not nearly as fast as those above me, despite me using a lot more drift strats and shortcuts. I basically would have needed a god run to WR, and even then it may not have been possible.
I did some research and found this video comparing loading times on Wii U using various methods of loading the game...
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xw9533_peformance-comparison-of-wii-u-media_videogames
Basically in terms of speed, External SSD > Internal Memory > External HDD > Disc. If you don't know, SSD stands for solid state drive, which is basically a faster version of the hard drive that doesn't have moving parts.
So I tried it. I found a used 120gb SSD on amazon for about $30, then grabbed an external case for it as well as a USB 'Y' cable (you need one of these if your external case doesn't have its own power source- as I learned the hard way). It was about $45 USD total, and also worked as a solution to not having enough storage on the Wii U, so why not.
The result was a timesave of about two seconds per track purely from loading. Since my run was slightly weaker than my old pb in terms of gameplay, I estimate this method saved me in the neighborhood of 1:45 off using a digital copy on Wii U internal memory.
I'll do more timing later, but I believe the load times I now get match those Videowiz and burkhalter (who has removed his 200cc times) were getting.
So what we have here is the possibility of extra hardware helping with the speedrun. I consider this in the same category as OoT a few years ago, where players were buying Chinese N64's to save time.
Questions:
-
Burk and Vid- can you guys confirm that you were doing something like this to get your load times?
-
What do we think about runs that do this? Is it just another step up (like disc to digital) or is it unfair?
-
What do other Wii U communities do about this?
OPINION: I think it is silly that load times work like this and silly that I purchased this (I am silly). However, you probably can't really prevent something like this in a ruleset, as load times aren't always consistent anyway, and I'm not sure if the mods want to be timing loads anyway.
I propose a new variable on the charts- "Game Save Type" containing a drop down list with the options (Digital- External SSD, Digital- Internal Memory, Digital- External HDD, Disc). Would be weird, since the leaderboards are already pupulated with dozens of times however.
So yeah, that's about what I've been researching the past week or two. I will be submitting my run, but we'll see what this post says about all of this stuff.
I can confirm that Burk and I both use external HDDs for our runs. AeonFrodo even bought digital after finding this out, though I'm not sure if she uses an HDD or internal storage.
A lot of what people think about this can be found here and I doubt the mods will be willing to make changes to runs that are already submitted as I had mentioned in that thread that there are 500+ runs in total. In my opinion, it is fair as a speed run is a way to beat a game in the fastest method possible.
There are obviously mixed feelings about this all with examples here claiming to be WR in the video title but is 9 seconds behind in a cup category, and another example here where they label their video [Disk WR] with a time difference of 1m 49s.
I just have a Digital copy on my Wii U. No external SSD. It's really expensive over in Australia though, so I don't imagine getting one anytime soon. At the moment I just want to get a sub 1:37 for Items and see where I can take it from here
How the hell did I miss that other thread?
Yeah, I'm not saying there's anything wrong with it by any means (fastest hardware is standard in speedrun communities from what I have seen). I guess my main goal with this post was to cement it into people's minds more that this is a thing, since I was quite confused in my earlier runs.
Adding another variable to the charts would probably be unrealistic, spent more time thinking about it