Why do we exclude Shield of Arrav?
Deleted
8 years ago
England

We did have zlurah and fight caves, but the Runescape speedruns got hacked an they got deleted. I will re-add them back later today. If you've got twitter hit me up, link is in my bio on speedruns.com

England

I was just thinking, We'll remove Imp catcher because of RNG purposes and add shield of arrav. The only reason before because i thought it would have to be 2 people but never thought about 2 accounts.

England

Okay I've edited the rules and i've left it so there is no imp-catcher for any of the accounts. It would cause a bit of confusion if it was just for ironmen. Thankyou for the contribution.

England

Yeah man will do!

No imp catcher makes complete sense for Ironman Categories.

Also, why is Tutorial Island listed under the Level Leaderboards with different categories for Normal, Ironman, Ultimate Ironman.

But tutorial island is under levels and full game. It seems kinda redundant, and not in a good way.

England

No we don't. Stop.

England

That's okay. My biggest gripe was with categories such as "ALL F2P QUESTS (((apart from these few I personally didn't feel like doing)))" being given presidence over more inclusive runs. Just seems a bit silly in my opinion. Shouldn't the top categories on the page be of the intact, actually doing every quest etc. stuff with the misc. drop menu serving to list the more arbitrary categories?

Shield of Arrav is an extremely trivial quest to complete. Removing it as a requirement for nobeads% would shave about two minutes off the run and remove the need for multilogging. Some potential runners might lack PC specs to efficiently multilog for passing over the certificate halves. Arrav hurts the run much more than it helps the run and should not be included in nobeads%